Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Software recommendations category

Parent

Software recommendations category

+5
−4

Hello all, I was taking a look at proposed communities and saw the discussion about code reviews that lead to the creation of the category.

In the process I remembered of Software Recommendations site in SE. Shouldn't it be a category of Software Development too ? I think is different enough from normal development question in order to be categorized.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Related: resource requests (1 comment)
Post
+5
−0

At some extent, you can ask about (programming-related) software recommendations if you manage to narrow down the scope to something specific. A question like "which one of compiler x and compiler y currently got the best support for language standard z? I'm mainly interested in features a, b and c." would probably be fine.

What wouldn't be fine is something like "Which IDE is best for beginners learning language x?". This is too broad and unclear, it is asking for opinions, it doesn't really specify a "best criteria" other than beginner-friendly, which is very subjective.

What's mostly problematic and unlikely to be interesting/relevant to future users are "where can I find x" questions. This could come with all of the previously mentioned problems and additionally the issue of links dying over time. We don't want to create a site which some 5 years from now is just a big collection of dead links - that's how a site loses credibility. Also links to external sites are problematic because of safety and spamming attempts. In addition, "where can I find x" has a high risk of boiling down to low quality "google this for me" requests.

Software Recommendations would mean we had to create yet another category with yet another set of posting policies. I don't think we can justify broadening the scope again unless we have reason to think adding another category would mean significantly increased traffic in that category. The Code Review one has very low traffic (~1 post/month), to the point where it's hard to justify its existence.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I didn't knew about the very low traffic on Code Review. But anyway I don't think it's because it's a... (1 comment)
I didn't knew about the very low traffic on Code Review. But anyway I don't think it's because it's a...
nelson777‭ wrote over 2 years ago

I didn't knew about the very low traffic on Code Review. But anyway I don't think it's because it's an unwanted or uninteresting feature. This is because Codidact isn't widely known yet. Code Review in SE has many daily posts. Software Recomendations also. But I understand that this is a valid argument not create a new category now as there is no public. So I guess we have to wait a bit.
On the other hand, the most features the better to attract public. But anyway, that's for the team to decide. Just wanted to bring this idea. :)