Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Reaction comment doesn't appear if previous comment for retracted reaction was deleted

Parent

Reaction comment doesn't appear if previous comment for retracted reaction was deleted

+3
−0

On this answer I just reacted with “works for me” with comment, but then retracted it because of what finally turned out to be a mistake on my end, and deleted also the comment (and thus the comment thread). After figuring out my mistake, I gave again the “works for me” reaction with comment, but this time, the comment didn't appear (the reaction did).

This is clearly a bug, as the new comment should have appeared.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Created a GitHub issue (2 comments)
Post
+1
−0

I wrote this in a comment on the GitHub issue and would be interested in input:

I can think of two fixes, both in the reaction-handling code:

  1. Check for an existing thread (as it does now) and then, if it's deleted, undelete it. Problem: this can resurrect something that a moderator decided to delete (as the easiest way to clean up a mess), which could be a problem. We can mitigate that in various ways, or we can...
  2. Check for an existing thread (as now), and if it's deleted, break the association between that thread and the reaction and then create a new reaction thread as if that other one didn't exist. If the other one gets undeleted, it's just history, not the active thread. Breaking the association could include renaming it to make that clear. (I don't know how the code works; maybe renaming it is enough to break the association?)
History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I'd suggest option 2, if practical. (1 comment)
I'd suggest option 2, if practical.
celtschk‭ wrote over 2 years ago

Well, as I had mentioned in the Github thread, starting a new thread is what I had expected to happen, so that would be a point for option 2. Obviously someone who understands the code will have to say what is practical to do.