Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Comments on Is this HTML sanitizer safe?
Parent
Is this HTML sanitizer safe?
I wrote this HTML sanitizer for use in web scraping. The idea is to safely copy content from a site but apply my own style-sheet and remove any unsafe elements. This whitelist approach seems very different from other sanitizers that I have seen. Is there any disadvantage of doing it this way that I should be aware of?
const allowedNodeTypes = [
'p',
'span',
'div',
'a',
'img',
'h1',
'h2',
'h3',
'h4',
'h5',
'strong',
'b',
'em',
'pre',
'blockquote',
'table',
'tr',
'td',
'tbody',
'u',
'br',
'i',
'ul',
'ol',
'li',
'figure',
'code',
'hr',
'italic',
'font',
'sup',
'sub'
]
const allowedAttributeTypes = [
'href',
'src',
'alt',
'title'
]
const urlTransformAttributeTypes = [
'src',
'href'
]
function recursivelyCopyContent(elem1, elem2, keep_tags) {
while (elem2.firstChild){
elem2.removeChild(elem2.firstChild);
}
if (keep_tags === undefined) {
keep_tags = true;
}
elem1.childNodes.forEach(child=>{
if (child.nodeType === Node.TEXT_NODE){
elem2.appendChild(
document.createTextNode(child.data)
);
}
else if (child.nodeType === Node.ELEMENT_NODE) {
let tag = child.tagName.toLowerCase();
if (allowedNodeTypes.indexOf(tag)>=0){
let element = document.createElement(keep_tags?tag:'span');
if (keep_tags){
for (var name of child.attributes){
if (urlTransformAttributeTypes.indexOf(name.nodeName)>=0){
element.setAttribute(name.nodeName, new URL(name.value, 'https://target_site.com/folder/'));
}
else if (allowedAttributeTypes.indexOf(name.nodeName)>=0){
element.setAttribute(name.nodeName, name.value);
} else {
console.log("not alled attribute", name.nodeName);
}
}
}
recursivelyCopyContent(child, element);
elem2.appendChild(element);
} else {
console.log("Not allowed", tag);
}
}
});
}
let htmlDoc = parser.parseFromString(await page.text(), 'text/html');
recursivelyCopyContent(htmlDoc.getElementsByClassName('article-body')[0],
document.getElementById('content')
);
Post
Is there any disadvantage of doing it this way that I should be aware of?
In general whitelisting is the best way to sanitise, but it does create important error classes, especially missing items. I think that your list of allowedNodeTypes could be better ordered to allow manual checking (e.g. 'strong' and 'b' are together, but 'em' and 'i' are not), and it's not obvious that the omission of 'h6' was intentional.
Is there some HTML spec which adds an <italic> tag?
The idea is to safely copy content from a site but apply my own style-sheet
In that case, shouldn't <font> get special treatment?
let element = document.createElement(keep_tags?tag:'span');
This seems to alias the name of the DOM class Element - or, at least, my editor's JavaScript highlighting thinks so. Maybe rename it to child2?
for (var name of child.attributes){
Why name? That looks like something that was written when you expected the iterator to give you names instead of nodes and wasn't corrected when the body of the loop was.
if (urlTransformAttributeTypes.indexOf(name.nodeName)>=0){ element.setAttribute(name.nodeName, new URL(name.value, 'https://target_site.com/folder/')); } else if (allowedAttributeTypes.indexOf(name.nodeName)>=0){
This is the only usage of allowedAttributeTypes, and it's only used if the name wasn't found in urlTransformAttributeTypes. Therefore it's inefficient and confusing to have some names present in both.
1 comment thread
0 comment threads