Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Automatically install all packages needed

Parent

Automatically install all packages needed

+7
−1

When running various Python scripts, I often need to do this annoying dance:

$ python script.py
...
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'foo'
$ pip install foo
$ python script.py
...
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'bar'
$ pip install bar
$ python script.py
...
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'baz'
$ pip install baz
$ python script.py
(correct output from script)

Yes, I know this can be solved by creating a requirements.txt file, packaging the script, etc. But I'm asking about cases where that ship has sailed. All I have is a script that optimistically imports stuff.

Python already knows what package it's supposed to be, since it's named in the ModuleNotFoundError. Is there a way to tell Python to react by attempting a pip install on that, rather than raising an exception?


I am aware that:

  • ModuleNotFoundError may raise not just for missing packages, but also modules (eg. foo.py) in the same directory. I'm happy with a solution that blindly assumes it's always PyPi packages.
  • Some packages use a different name for pip install and import. I'm happy with a solution that fails or installs the wrong package in this case.
  • It is dangerous to blindly install packages from PyPi. I'm okay with the risks.
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

The name of a package in PYPI is not always the same as the name you import, so this won't always wor... (1 comment)
Post
+5
−0

The best approach is probably to just check the script beforehand, something like the following

grep import script.py

should list all imports and you can then evaluate and install them.

If you really want to automate things you can write a short shell script to loop & install modules for example this one in bash:

#!/usr/bin/env bash
while :;
do
  { STDERR="$( { ${@}; } 2>&1 1>&3 3>&- )"; } 3>&1;
  if [[ $? -eq 0 ]]; then
    break
  else
    module=$(printf '%s' "$STDERR" | grep ModuleNotFoundError | cut -d\' -f 2)
    pip install $module
  fi
done

when saved as install.sh in the current directory can be used as bash install.sh python script.py

If you create a virtual environment with something like python -m venv env; source env/bin/activate (which you should do to not pollute your global packages anyways) before you can generate a requirements.txt with pip freeze > requirements.txt afterwards and save yourself the hassle in future.

History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Explicitly comparing the result code in `$?` is a bit of a code smell, although I can vaguely see why... (1 comment)
Explicitly comparing the result code in `$?` is a bit of a code smell, although I can vaguely see why...
tripleee‭ wrote 11 months ago

Explicitly comparing the result code in $? is a bit of a code smell, although I can vaguely see why you might prefer that syntax here. To avoid it, if { STDERR="$( { ${@}; } 2>&1 1>&3 3>&- )"; } 3>&1; then ...