Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Can you have syntax highlighting for streaming text in Python?

Parent

Can you have syntax highlighting for streaming text in Python?

+1
−0

Suppose you have a situation where text is coming 1 word at a time, and you want to quickly show it to the user. "Quickly" is not in the sense of a performance constraint, but rather we don't want to wait until the end of the stream to apply highlighting as that would take too long. The rate is somewhat slow and sometimes the stream can be quite long.

The text is markdown but can often include substantial code. It would be important for the code to be highlighted well also. Sometimes the code fences indicate language, sometimes not.

Is this feasible, and how? I am asking specifically for printing text from a Python program.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+7
−0

The answer is "it depends". It depends on the language, how much buffering you're willing to allow, how much you're willing to accept some approximate/incorrect syntax highlighting, and whether you'd accept control codes that correct the syntax highlighting after the fact.

If your bar for syntax highlighting was simply that language keywords, operators, and other "punctuation" are highlighted, then almost all programming languages allow this with only a small amount of buffering needed. Some amount of buffering is needed because I can't tell if "i" is part of the keyword "if" until I see the next two characters.

On the other hand, if you wanted to highlight unmatched brackets, then you may not be able to correctly highlight an opening bracket at the beginning of the file until the very end of the file.

This is an issue in most languages for many non-trivial uses of syntax highlighting. Specifically, this is an issue with markdown if you'd like to, for example, use bold text for text wrapped in **s.

As the highlighting of this paragraph indicates, whether the text following ** is made bold depends on whether there is a following ** among other rules. I didn't do any escaping in this case.

Ultimately, the only (non-trivial) solution in general is for the streaming syntax highlighting to make a guess and sometimes be wrong. If allowed, it might be possible to use control codes to edit the previously displayed output when the syntax highlighter has enough context to realize it made a mistake.

bat, for example, just assumes ** starts a bold span and makes the following text bold even when this is incorrect.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Buffering (1 comment)
Buffering

My own guess was also that you have to buffer. Safest is probably to flush the buffer on blank lines - there seems to be little syntax whether Markdown or code that transcends a blank line, and it wouldn't be a great loss if that was incorrectly highlighted.

If the paragraph takes too long, probably you'd flush on . for Markdown or line breaks for code. That would introduce even more highlighting errors, but it's faster.

As per my python-3 tag, I meant to ask about doing this specifically when printing from Python to the console.