Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Reusing HTML without rewriting it

Parent

Reusing HTML without rewriting it

+5
−0

I have a site hosted through GitHub and I'm using footers for special links and it also serves as my main navigation bar for now. I find it a little frustrating to manually copy-paste the footer's contents and I could end up having footers different from one site to another with me missing a page or two to edit.

I'm aware of scripting languages, so that may be the way for me to continue, but with my lack of understanding of those languages, what can I do to automatically output something on every page of a site?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

Link to the site in question (1 comment)
Post
+8
−0

Use a static site generator. There are other possibilities, but they seem more complicated or worse for your use case.

A static site generator takes in source data in some combination of markup formats (commonly including raw HTML and Markdown) and generates complete HTML pages from that. A key feature of these tools is support for templates which can capture the common structure of related types of pages. These tools usually offer additional features, e.g. they may be able to generate navigation bars, tables of contents, and RSS/Atom feeds.

There are two basic ways to go about this. First, you can choose your own static site generator, run it locally, and simply commit the resulting generated HTML to GitHub. This is exactly what I do for my GitHub Pages hosted site using Hakyll as the static site generator. The benefit of this approach is that you don't need any special support from your hosting provider - so if you decide to host your site somewhere else, you just need to upload the generated HTML somewhere else.

The second way, which is probably better in your situation, is to use the static site generator built in to GitHub Pages. In particular, GitHub Pages supports Jekyll, a popular Ruby-based static site generator. For your specific purpose, you'd probably want to use the layouts and/or includes feature. This way, you don't need to set up Jekyll yourself (though you will probably want to), and the history of your GitHub repository will reflect the actual meaningful changes you make and not a bunch of generated noise.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

I don't think that "use a static site generator" and "use a static site generator in GitHub Pages" ar... (2 comments)
I don't think that "use a static site generator" and "use a static site generator in GitHub Pages" ar...
user253751‭ wrote 2 months ago

I don't think that "use a static site generator" and "use a static site generator in GitHub Pages" are really two different solutions. I was expecting the second one to be server-side includes.

Derek Elkins‭ wrote 2 months ago

I did say they were related. The difference is whether you use what GitHub has or you just give GitHub the output of a tool of your choice. As far as I know, GitHub Pages does not support server-side includes. If it does, then feel free to add an answer explaining how to use it with GitHub Pages.

There are, of course, many other options that could be use if you host elsewhere or run your own server, but those didn't seem appropriate for the OP. Another solution that could be used on GitHub Pages would be to make one's site a single page application and handle everything client-side. Again, that didn't really seem appropriate for this OP, nor do I think it is a better solution than a static site generator in this case.