Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

83%

+13 −1

Q&A What is the difference between operator precedence and order of evaluation?

When doing something simple such as this int a=1; int b=2; int c=3; printf("%d\n", a + b * c); then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to a + (b * c)...

1 answer · posted 4y ago by Lundin‭ · last activity 3d ago by Lundin‭

Question c operator-precedence order-of-evaluation unspecified-behavior

#4: Post edited by

Lundin‭ · 2021-02-01T11:54:34Z (almost 4 years ago)
Formatting

Copy Link

Raw

Markdown

When doing something simple such as this
int a=1;
int b=2;
int c=3;
printf("%d\n", a + b * c);
~~then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to `a + (b * c)`, since `*` has higher precedence than `+`. And so the result is guaranteed to be 7 and not 9.~~
However, when I modify the above example like this:
#include <stdio.h>
int a (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 1; }
int b (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 2; }
int c (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 3; }
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n", a() + b() * c());
return 0;
}
Then I get the output `a b c 7`. How is this possible?
Shouldn't operator precedence guarantee that `b()` is executed before `a()`?

When doing something simple such as this
int a=1;
int b=2;
int c=3;
printf("%d\n", a + b * c);
then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to
`a + (b * c)`, since `*` has higher precedence than `+`. And so the result is guaranteed to be 7 and not 9.
However, when I modify the above example like this:
#include <stdio.h>
int a (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 1; }
int b (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 2; }
int c (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 3; }
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n", a() + b() * c());
return 0;
}
Then I get the output `a b c 7`. How is this possible?
Shouldn't operator precedence guarantee that `b()` is executed before `a()`?

#3: Post edited by

Lundin‭ · 2020-09-24T06:41:34Z (about 4 years ago)

Copy Link

Raw

Markdown

c c++ operator-precedence order-of-evaluation unspecified-behavior

c operator-precedence order-of-evaluation unspecified-behavior

#2: Post edited by

Lundin‭ · 2020-09-23T14:17:28Z (about 4 years ago)

Copy Link

Raw

Markdown

When doing something simple such as this
int a=1;
int b=2;
int c=3;
printf("%d\n", a + b * c);
then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to `a + (b * c)`, since `*` has higher precedence than `+`. And so the result is guaranteed to be 7 and not 9.
However, when I modify the above example like this:
#include <stdio.h>
int a (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 1; }
int b (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 2; }
int c (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 3; }
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n", a() + b() * c());
return 0;
}
Then I get the output `a b c 7`. How is this possible? And when I try the identical code on another compiler, I get the opposite order `c b a 7`.
Shouldn't operator precedence guarantee that `b()` is executed before `a()`?

When doing something simple such as this
int a=1;
int b=2;
int c=3;
printf("%d\n", a + b * c);
then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to `a + (b * c)`, since `*` has higher precedence than `+`. And so the result is guaranteed to be 7 and not 9.
However, when I modify the above example like this:
#include <stdio.h>
int a (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 1; }
int b (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 2; }
int c (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 3; }
int main (void)
{
printf("%d\n", a() + b() * c());
return 0;
}
Then I get the output `a b c 7`. How is this possible?
Shouldn't operator precedence guarantee that `b()` is executed before `a()`?

#1: Initial revision by

Lundin‭ · 2020-09-23T10:16:37Z (about 4 years ago)

Copy Link

Raw

Markdown

What is the difference between operator precedence and order of evaluation?

When doing something simple such as this

    int a=1;
    int b=2;
    int c=3;
    printf("%d\n", a + b * c);

then I was told that operator precedence guarantees that the code is equivalent to `a + (b * c)`, since `*` has higher precedence than `+`. And so the result is guaranteed to be 7 and not 9.

However, when I modify the above example like this:

    #include <stdio.h>

    int a (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 1; }
    int b (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 2; }
    int c (void) { printf("%s ",__func__); return 3; }

    int main (void)
    {
      printf("%d\n", a() + b() * c());
      return 0;
    }

Then I get the output `a b c 7`. How is this possible? And when I try the identical code on another compiler, I get the opposite order `c b a 7`.

Shouldn't operator precedence guarantee that `b()` is executed before `a()`?

c c++ operator-precedence order-of-evaluation unspecified-behavior

Communities

Post History