Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Do we need more specific up/down vote reasons for Software Development community?

+6
−0

The help center includes a rather generic (it's the same for all communities) article about voting.

Recently a user flagged a question asking why it had received so many downvotes. While flagging is not for this type of issue, this made me wonder if users are aware of how upvote and downvote are supposed to work and what they mean for Software Development community.

Should we have a more clear and concise way of conveying the information about upvoting and downvoting?

As a reference, I like how SE network shows concise tooltips for each of the two actions:

For questions

  • Upvote - This question shows research effort; it is useful and clear
  • Downvote - This question does not show any research effort; it is unclear of not useful

For answers

  • Upvote - this answer is useful
  • Downvote - this answer is not useful

Not sure how it would be better from a UX perspective, but replacing the computed score with such tooltips might provide more value.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (5 comments)

2 answers

You are accessing this answer with a direct link, so it's being shown above all other answers regardless of its score. You can return to the normal view.

+4
−0

I prefer the current way.

Regarding tooltips

Experience shows that tooltips can survive a lot of time being obsolete. In SO in meta they have "This answer is useful" and "This answer is not useful". But that is not really what it means in meta there. It is ok to downvote if you disagree while thinking that the answer was useful in an ongoing discussion. Though, yes, we could do better.

Are these tooltips going to help the flagger know why they got their downvotes? Unlikely, they should ask in comments.

A size fits all is hard. Do all questions really need to show research effort?

Regarding an extra system of reasons

There will be no end to the reasons that need to be added. And when the list is large enough most people won't bother looking for the right one.

We already have a system. Comments. There is a concern discussed elsewhere about public criticism being hard to swallow some times. But I think comments are the way to go and the flagger should be encouraged to comment asking for reasons. Themselves being the ones asking for them they should hopefully be more receptive to criticism.

Sure, some times "Why was this downvoted?" actually means "curse, why, insult, something worse". But no system can really change that.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

+5
−0

I agree that these buttons should have tooltips explaining what the buttons are for. That would be far more useful than showing the result of a simple calculation on the displayed votes, and seems like a simple change to make.

Making this site configurable would be ideal, but even a "this question is useful and clear" would be better than the status quo.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »