Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

71%
+3 −0
Q&A Proper way of sending large amount of data from View to ViewModel

I agree with you in that using MutableLiveData for achieving this feels wrong. I think this is because: LiveData is meant for sending data to LifecycleOwners such as Activity or Fragment, abstra...

posted 3y ago by nnlei‭

Answer
#1: Initial revision by user avatar nnlei‭ · 2021-08-24T15:38:03Z (over 3 years ago)
I agree with you in that using `MutableLiveData` for achieving this feels wrong. I think this is because:

- `LiveData` is meant for sending data *to* `LifecycleOwner`s such as `Activity` or `Fragment`, abstracting the lifecycle away, and your workaround sends data in the opposite direction.
- as a result, if your `View` happens to send data by through `MutableLiveData` while the lifecycle is stopped or paused, any callback you attach on the `MutableLiveData` on the `ViewModel` side simply will not run, which is probably not what you would expect.
- afaik `View`s are not `LifecycleOwner`s in the first place.

-----

What I've seen in most projects when they want to react to a Button click is that the Activity sets a View.OnClickListener as an anonymous class:

```
class MyActivity: Activity() {

    private lateinit var viewModel: MyViewModel

    override fun onCreate(...) {
        super.onCreate(...)
        
        viewModel = ....
    
        myButton.setOnClickListener {
             viewModel.myActionTriggered(...)
        }
    }
}
```


So to me, it makes sense to do something along those lines in your case too:

```
class MyActivity: Activity() {

    private lateinit var viewModel: MyViewModel

    override fun onCreate(...) {
        super.onCreate(...)
        
        viewModel = ....
    
        myCanvas.setListOfPointsListener { points ->
             viewModel.onListOfPointsChanged(points)
        }
    }
}

```

This way:
- neither the `Activity` nor the `ViewModel` need to implement the ad-hoc interface
- the `ViewModel` doesn't need to expose anything "mutable"
- the `LiveData` get data out of the `ViewModel` to the `Activity` as it should, not the other way around
- the `ViewModel` can still get the data from the `View` even when the lifecycle is "off", and it still can change its internal state in this case (other than posting to other `LiveData`, which would not work until the lifecycle is back "on")

----

A little off-topic comment: I think the name of `ListOfPoints` does not reflect what your interface does does. Your Activity doesn't become a "list of points", but rather a list of points *listener*. It doesn't contain the points itself, it just does something whenever that list changes.