Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

62%
+3 −1
Q&A Are there practical reasons for designing a method-only class/object?

Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object? Follow-up background notes: This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented, for exam...

3 answers  ·  posted 3y ago by CodeFarmer‭  ·  last activity 3y ago by hkotsubo‭

#5: Post edited by user avatar CodeFarmer‭ · 2021-09-20T21:09:16Z (about 3 years ago)
Add example languages
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Follow-up background notes:
  • This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
  • The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Follow-up background notes:
  • This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented, for example, Python and Perl. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
  • The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#4: Post edited by user avatar CodeFarmer‭ · 2021-09-08T18:09:20Z (about 3 years ago)
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Follow-up background notes:
  • ---------------------------
  • This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
  • The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Follow-up background notes:
  • This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
  • The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#3: Post edited by user avatar CodeFarmer‭ · 2021-09-08T18:09:01Z (about 3 years ago)
Try to improve the question by adding additional context based on initial responses.
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
  • Follow-up background notes:
  • ---------------------------
  • This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
  • The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#2: Post edited by user avatar Alexei‭ · 2021-08-31T04:23:24Z (about 3 years ago)
added relevant tag
#1: Initial revision by user avatar CodeFarmer‭ · 2021-08-30T21:28:34Z (about 3 years ago)
Are there practical reasons for designing a method-only class/object?
Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?