Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object? Follow-up background notes: This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented, for exam...
#5: Post edited
by
CodeFarmer
·
2021-09-20T21:09:16Z (over 3 years ago)
Add example languages
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Follow-up background notes:
This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.- The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Follow-up background notes:
- This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented, for example, Python and Perl. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
- The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#4: Post edited
by
CodeFarmer
·
2021-09-08T18:09:20Z (over 3 years ago)
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Follow-up background notes:
---------------------------- This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
- The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Follow-up background notes:
- This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
- The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#3: Post edited
by
CodeFarmer
·
2021-09-08T18:09:01Z (over 3 years ago)
Try to improve the question by adding additional context based on initial responses.
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?
- Follow-up background notes:
- ---------------------------
- This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent functions.
- The event that started me thinking about this is that was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I wonder what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be grouped to classes/object.
#2: Post edited
by
Alexei
·
2021-08-31T04:23:24Z (over 3 years ago)
added relevant tag
#1: Initial revision
by
CodeFarmer
·
2021-08-30T21:28:34Z (over 3 years ago)
Are there practical reasons for designing a method-only class/object?
Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object?