Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

How do I search for "i++"?

+9
−0

I once wrote this post here: Why can't we mix increment operators like i++ with other operators?

When using Codidact search looking for that post, I tried to type i++ in the search but it didn't like that syntax. Then I tried "i++" but then the search gave no results. How should I search for the above post title using i++ as search key?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+3
−0

It looks like the answer is "you don't", unfortunately. Because of how our search system works, the "+" character is always treated as an operator. Not that it matters, because non-word characters aren't actually considered part of the index at all - just the words.

While this works for most Q&A pretty well, it's not as good for technical content that includes a lot of symbols (like code snippets, or equations). We could look at whether it's possible to offer other query modes that would work better for this kind of content — I haven't looked into that at all yet, so I don't know how possible it would be.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »