Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

77%
+5 −0
Q&A Keep local branch changes to resolve all remaining conflicts in a merge

On branch-x, I do git merge branch-y Now there are some conflicts, and git status shows Changes to be committed: new file: a new file: b Unmerged paths: (use "git a...

1 answer  ·  posted 2y ago by Quasímodo‭  ·  last activity 2y ago by Quasímodo‭

#3: Post edited by user avatar Quasímodo‭ · 2022-08-06T16:10:57Z (over 2 years ago)
Fix unadequate syntax highlighting
  • On branch-x, I do
  • git merge branch-y
  • Now there are some conflicts, and `git status` shows
  • ```
  • Changes to be committed:
  • new file: a
  • new file: b
  • Unmerged paths:
  • (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
  • both added: w
  • both modified: x
  • both added: y
  • both modified: z1
  • both modified: z2
  • ```
  • Specifically, the conflict of files `z1` and `z2` I have to resolve manually (by inspecting and eliminating the `<<<<<<< HEAD`, `>>>>>>> branch-y` markers).
  • But for all other conflicts, I want to keep the local changes, as if I always chose the `<<<<<<< HEAD` segment and never the `>>>>>>> branch-y` one.
  • I could of course do that manually, but there are many files left.
  • **How can I merge all the remaining files by keeping the local branch changes only?**
  • I found `git merge --strategy-option ours` but that doesn't seem to work for an already started merge:
  • ```
  • error: Merging is not possible because you have unmerged files.
  • hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
  • hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
  • fatal: Exiting because of an unresolved conflict.
  • ```
  • On branch-x, I do
  • ```none
  • git merge branch-y
  • ```
  • Now there are some conflicts, and `git status` shows
  • ```none
  • Changes to be committed:
  • new file: a
  • new file: b
  • Unmerged paths:
  • (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
  • both added: w
  • both modified: x
  • both added: y
  • both modified: z1
  • both modified: z2
  • ```
  • Specifically, the conflict of files `z1` and `z2` I have to resolve manually (by inspecting and eliminating the `<<<<<<< HEAD`, `>>>>>>> branch-y` markers).
  • But for all other conflicts, I want to keep the local changes, as if I always chose the `<<<<<<< HEAD` segment and never the `>>>>>>> branch-y` one.
  • I could of course do that manually, but there are many files left.
  • **How can I merge all the remaining files by keeping the local branch changes only?**
  • I found `git merge --strategy-option ours` but that doesn't seem to work for an already started merge:
  • ```none
  • error: Merging is not possible because you have unmerged files.
  • hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
  • hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
  • fatal: Exiting because of an unresolved conflict.
  • ```
#2: Post edited by user avatar Alexei‭ · 2022-08-05T06:04:59Z (over 2 years ago)
added relevant tags
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Quasímodo‭ · 2022-08-04T13:34:31Z (over 2 years ago)
Keep local branch changes to resolve all remaining conflicts in a merge
On branch-x, I do

    git merge branch-y

Now there are some conflicts, and `git status` shows

```
Changes to be committed:
        new file:   a
        new file:   b

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add <file>..." to mark resolution)
        both added:      w
        both modified:   x
        both added:      y
        both modified:   z1
        both modified:   z2
```

Specifically, the conflict of files `z1` and `z2` I have to resolve manually (by inspecting and eliminating the `<<<<<<< HEAD`, `>>>>>>> branch-y` markers).

But for all other conflicts, I want to keep the local changes, as if I always chose the `<<<<<<< HEAD` segment and never the `>>>>>>> branch-y` one.

I could of course do that manually, but there are many files left.

**How can I merge all the remaining files by keeping the local branch changes only?**

I found  `git merge --strategy-option ours` but that doesn't seem to work for an already started merge:

```
error: Merging is not possible because you have unmerged files.
hint: Fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>'
hint: as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit.
fatal: Exiting because of an unresolved conflict.
```
git