Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Post History
Note: this is inspired by the comments on this post and especially this one which mentions: We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks...
#2: Post edited
by
trichoplax
·
2022-12-28T20:42:32Z (almost 2 years ago)
Add missing word
Deciding if a concept can be materialized to a tag
- **Note**: this is inspired by the comments on [this post](https://software.codidact.com/posts/287605/287607#answer-287607) and especially [this one](https://software.codidact.com/comments/thread/7064#comment-18966) which mentions:
- > We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks, design patterns, etc. Who is an ‘interface’ enthusiast?
- This discussion made me question the way I am tagging questions. As I could not find a discussion about this, I am opening one with this post.
- From my perspective, tags should:
- help connect matter experts with the question (e.g. filter by tag, subscribe to receive notifications by a tag)- - very briefly describe the topic of the question (i.e. synonymous with "labeling").
- - be general enough that it is likely to be reused in the future for other questions
- What do you think about this? How should we propose/create tags?
- Based on your feedback, I intend to create a Help section topic about this.
- **Note**: this is inspired by the comments on [this post](https://software.codidact.com/posts/287605/287607#answer-287607) and especially [this one](https://software.codidact.com/comments/thread/7064#comment-18966) which mentions:
- > We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks, design patterns, etc. Who is an ‘interface’ enthusiast?
- This discussion made me question the way I am tagging questions. As I could not find a discussion about this, I am opening one with this post.
- From my perspective, tags should:
- - help connect subject matter experts with the question (e.g. filter by tag, subscribe to receive notifications by a tag)
- - very briefly describe the topic of the question (i.e. synonymous with "labeling").
- - be general enough that it is likely to be reused in the future for other questions
- What do you think about this? How should we propose/create tags?
- Based on your feedback, I intend to create a Help section topic about this.
#1: Initial revision
by
Alexei
·
2022-12-28T14:41:00Z (almost 2 years ago)
Deciding if a concept can be materialized to a tag
**Note**: this is inspired by the comments on [this post](https://software.codidact.com/posts/287605/287607#answer-287607) and especially [this one](https://software.codidact.com/comments/thread/7064#comment-18966) which mentions: > We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks, design patterns, etc. Who is an ‘interface’ enthusiast? This discussion made me question the way I am tagging questions. As I could not find a discussion about this, I am opening one with this post. From my perspective, tags should: - help connect matter experts with the question (e.g. filter by tag, subscribe to receive notifications by a tag) - very briefly describe the topic of the question (i.e. synonymous with "labeling"). - be general enough that it is likely to be reused in the future for other questions What do you think about this? How should we propose/create tags? Based on your feedback, I intend to create a Help section topic about this.