Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Deciding if a concept can be materialized to a tag

+4
−0

Note: this is inspired by the comments on this post and especially this one which mentions:

We have tags for languages because people have interest or expertise in languages; likewise frameworks, design patterns, etc. Who is an ‘interface’ enthusiast?

This discussion made me question the way I am tagging questions. As I could not find a discussion about this, I am opening one with this post.

From my perspective, tags should:

  • help connect subject matter experts with the question (e.g. filter by tag, subscribe to receive notifications by a tag)
  • very briefly describe the topic of the question (i.e. synonymous with "labeling").
  • be general enough that it is likely to be reused in the future for other questions

What do you think about this? How should we propose/create tags?

Based on your feedback, I intend to create a Help section topic about this.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

1 answer

+2
−0

The sole purpose of tags should be to help classify posts into what they are roughly about.

Being able to easily get the broad topic of posts is obviously useful in searches, but may also be useful for statistics in the future. For example, if a large fraction of posts are about a particular language, then it might be reasonable to create a category just for that language. Such a query would be hard to do without good tags.

Overloading tags to provide anything other than a broad classification of topics will lessen their usefulness for the intended purpose.

When deciding on using or creating a particular tag, a good question to ask yourself is "Will the tag help people find this post when searching?":.

Tags are also not content. Just because way down at the bottom a post is tagged "C++" doesn't absolve the asker of mentioning the language is C++ in the question directly. The text of a question needs to stand on its own, regardless of what is in the title or the list of tags.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

0 comment threads

Sign up to answer this question »