Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Post History

60%
+1 −0
Q&A How do I share a type between a client and server, but make a specific field optional for one and required for the other?

The existing answer is fine, but you can achieve similar results in many ways using some of TypeScript's utility types. Required<T> While you cannot use (only) Partial to do this, TypeScrip...

posted 11d ago by Jacob Raihle‭  ·  edited 11d ago by Jacob Raihle‭

Answer
#2: Post edited by user avatar Jacob Raihle‭ · 2024-05-09T14:15:16Z (11 days ago)
  • The existing answer is fine, but you can achieve similar results in many ways using some of [TypeScript's utility types](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/utility-types.html).
  • ### `Required<T>`
  • While you cannot use (only) `Partial` to do this, TypeScript provides the opposite `Required` as well - so if one of your types requires all properties, you can start by defining the one with some optional ones:
  • ```typescript
  • type UserForClients = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
  • };
  • type UserForServers = Required<UserForClients>;
  • ```
  • ### `Partial<T>` and (`Omit<T, K>` or `Pick<T, K>`)
  • Going in the other direction, starting with a "base" type and making some properties optional. `Partial` makes everything optional, but by combining it with parts of the base type that still require some properties, we can "cancel" the optionality:
  • ```typescript
  • type UserForServers = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
  • };
  • type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Omit<UserForServers, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;
  • // Or, equivalently
  • type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Pick<UserForServers, "name">;
  • ```
  • ### Custom Utility types
  • We can create some utility types of our own to handle these cases if they are frequent:
  • ```typescript
  • type WithOptional<T, K extends keyof T> = Partial<T> & Omit<T, K>;
  • type UserForServer = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
  • };
  • type UserForClient = WithOptional<UserForServer, "superSecretGovermentIdNumber">;
  • // Or, equivalently
  • type WithRequired<T, K extends keyof T> = T & Required<Pick<T, K>>;
  • type UserForClient = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
  • };
  • type UserForServer = WithRequired<UserForClient, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;
  • ```
  • The existing answer is fine, but you can achieve similar results in many ways using some of [TypeScript's utility types](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/utility-types.html).
  • ### `Required<T>`
  • While you cannot use (only) `Partial` to do this, TypeScript provides the opposite `Required` as well - so if one of your types requires all properties, you can start by defining the one with some optional ones:
  • ```typescript
  • type UserForClients = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
  • };
  • type UserForServers = Required<UserForClients>;
  • ```
  • ### `Partial<T>` and (`Omit<T, K>` or `Pick<T, K>`)
  • Going in the other direction, starting with a "base" type and making some properties optional. `Partial` makes everything optional, but by combining it with parts of the base type that still require some properties, we can "cancel" the optionality:
  • ```typescript
  • type UserForServers = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
  • };
  • type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Omit<UserForServers, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;
  • // Or, equivalently
  • type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Pick<UserForServers, "name">;
  • ```
  • ### Custom Utility types
  • We can create some utility types of our own to handle these cases if they are frequent:
  • ```typescript
  • type WithOptional<T, K extends keyof T> = Partial<T> & Omit<T, K>;
  • type UserForServer = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
  • };
  • type UserForClient = WithOptional<UserForServer, "superSecretGovermentIdNumber">;
  • // Or, equivalently
  • type RequireOnly<T, K extends keyof T> = Partial<T> & Required<Pick<T, K>>;
  • type UserForServer = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
  • };
  • type UserForClient = RequireOnly<UserForServer, "name">;
  • // Or, equivalently
  • type WithRequired<T, K extends keyof T> = T & Required<Pick<T, K>>;
  • type UserForClient = {
  • name: string;
  • superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
  • };
  • type UserForServer = WithRequired<UserForClient, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;
  • ```
#1: Initial revision by user avatar Jacob Raihle‭ · 2024-05-09T14:10:26Z (11 days ago)
The existing answer is fine, but you can achieve similar results in many ways using some of [TypeScript's utility types](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/utility-types.html).

### `Required<T>`

While you cannot use (only) `Partial` to do this, TypeScript provides the opposite `Required` as well - so if one of your types requires all properties, you can start by defining the one with some optional ones:

```typescript
type UserForClients = {
   name: string;
   superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
};

type UserForServers = Required<UserForClients>;
```

### `Partial<T>` and (`Omit<T, K>` or `Pick<T, K>`)
Going in the other direction, starting with a "base" type and making some properties optional. `Partial` makes everything optional, but by combining it with parts of the base type that still require some properties, we can "cancel" the optionality:

```typescript
type UserForServers = {
    name: string;
    superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
};

type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Omit<UserForServers, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;

// Or, equivalently

type UserForClients = Partial<UserForServers> & Pick<UserForServers, "name">;
```

### Custom Utility types

We can create some utility types of our own to handle these cases if they are frequent:

```typescript
type WithOptional<T, K extends keyof T> = Partial<T> & Omit<T, K>;

type UserForServer = {
   name: string;
   superSecretGovernmentIdNumber: string;
};

type UserForClient = WithOptional<UserForServer, "superSecretGovermentIdNumber">;

// Or, equivalently

type WithRequired<T, K extends keyof T> = T & Required<Pick<T, K>>;

type UserForClient = {
    name: string;
    superSecretGovernmentIdNumber?: string;
};

type UserForServer = WithRequired<UserForClient, "superSecretGovernmentIdNumber">;
```