Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Activity for Alexei‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Comment Post #279449 I think in order to fully understand you should provide more details. Is this task a custom task? (e.g. removes an existing file and downloads a newer version). The error might also appear when the file to delete is not found. Since this is not always happening, I suspect it is not related to Jenkins...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278978 Also, can you provide more information about "run out of memory"? Is it the stack (too much recursion?) or another type of memory?
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278978 Can you please post the relevant parts of your procedure? As written, this looks like an XY problem (i.e. the issue seems to be in the way the procedure is written not the VARCHAR length).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278952 I have reported the issue on GitHub (thanks Monica for moving it to the right place, now I know that qpixel is the actual project :) ): https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/268
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279035 @Charlie Brumbaugh‭ Yes, that means that the index contains that column + columns in the PK. That would explain the second point which actually seems to be the only point: all indexes will only cover the column in the PK.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279002 @FractionalRadix Yes, [binding] is very general, but it is what I heard being used for frameworks such a Windows Forms. WPF, Angular and Xamarin. Maybe something like [android-viewbinding] is more appropriate, but I am not sure if this is what you are using (never programmed directly with Java in And...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #279002 I have also added [binding] tag as the concept seems to be used (bind view to viewmodel). Very good question btw.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278988 @Moshi That would be great and intuitive for anyone using such a feature.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278982 Not sure, but shrink gets the database to 4GB and reindexing gets it to about ~5GB.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278952 @Moshi That's a good idea. I will raise an issue @ GitHub repo. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278952 @Lundin Automatic removal would be really nice, but current caching makes things really confusing as shown in my example.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278785 On-topic now includes a quick introduction for those in a hurry (thanks to [this suggestion](https://software.codidact.com/questions/278648#answer-278666)). Having "a separate Meta post for every rule, and link to these canonical posts from the FAQ" is indeed possible, but leads to even more stuff to...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278788 I understand what "questions asked not to learn, but to off-load work", but it might sound too vague for newbies. From my experience with SO, I know there is a large number of posts that show no effort or do not include any attempts. It is such a serious issue that I favor explicitly mentioning our e...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278789 I have fixed it. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278650 This suggestion has been included. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278653 I have also updated the help to include a code review guideline and a designated item in the on-topic section pointing to it.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278667 I have applied this suggestion, but also added an example to off-topic item "questions about computers or software that are not connected to software development/engineering" (asking for recommendations). Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278666 Nice suggestion. I have added it as an introduction paragraph in the On-topic section as it kind of summarizes all the other points. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278651 I have applied your suggestion (in a simplified form, as "database design" is repeated). Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278787 I have rephrased that item from the help section to correspond to your suggestion. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278786 I have updated the section to reflect your suggestion ("keep it simple"). Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278817 I agree with these points and I have used Stack Overflow as a model because they have the advantage of time and size. They have millions of questions asked over years and by now tags must be in a stable state.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278899 The debate related to this question made me go further with [Super User site proposal](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278833#answer-278908). Once we start it, we will migrate this question there.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278899 I have reopened it since we do not have the Power User community yet. I still think it might fit better in such a community, but since it is still not yet live, I guess we can have it here.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278899 @‭Charlie Brumbaugh Yes, I think the context is important. I have little experience with working in Linux, but I assume the context used to issue the command (some tokens might not interpreted in the same way as when run from bash or similar). The context is also helpful to propose alternatives to ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278899 @Matthias Braun Welcome to Software Codidact. Unfortunately, your question does not seem related to software development. I have already proposed a community [for this type of questions](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/278833), but we are not ready yet.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278322 @pnuts Is it OK to rename [tickboxes] to [checkboxes]? It has the advantage that it makes sense also for many other application types.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278780 @Lundin After reading the post, I did not see anything directly related to RAM memory (not sure, but memory management at application level normally deals with the virtual memory not with RAM directly). Indeed the answer argues about the RAM, but tagging applies to the question, not the answers. Feel...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278782 Thanks for the comments, they provide great insight. Ref. to usage of ngrx/store: clearly overkill for this code alone, but this code is part of a much larger application where I have used this pattern.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277536 @jrh I have removed our last comments because they provide no value for the question.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278780 @ArtOfCode I have made the edit 6h ago and I thought the same thing and waited and rechecked. So less likely to [blame the cache](https://shouldiblamecaching.com/).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278727 @Moshi [iis-urlrewrite] can be defined, but I would try to keep tags count as low as possible. By using [iis] and [url-rewritting], we have only two tags that are quite reusable.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278727 @Monica Cellio - yes, you are right: there are two aspects. I would use url-rewritting + iis.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278648 I will keep "What type of questions can I ask here?" section unchanged for a few more days and integrate the changes based on the support for each idea.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277373 Initially, I thought this was not an interesting question, but after digging a little I realized how hard it seems to be answerable for MySQL.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277303 Anti-pattern for alias names: a, b, c, d ... I have seen this being used in a project and I find it mind-blowing since I try to connect the alias to the table based on its starting char.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278628 @r~~ Based on feedback provided by you and Lundin I have already refined the scope, so this issue is pretty covered. Not having such a policy makes it almost impossible to provide a reference to anyone asking about why a question is considered offtopic. Not having a policy is like a very small scale ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278628 @Lundin I agree and I have changed the scope page to include this topic with some restrictions (small enough and attempt to understand it). Despite a similar policy on SO, this type of questions are actually allowed ([example](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/18984775/what-does-this-code-do) ).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278628 @r~~ I understand your concern, but having a "not yet done" policy is better than having none at all. This is not set in stone and can evolve along with the community. I think this is an important part of the community because any new member has no easy way to understand what they are allowed to ask ...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278527 I have edited this post and a few others to better emphasize the references to the SE sites (Stack Overflow or Power User). Please try to use similar references (the source name and the author are the most important elements) for future posts. Thanks for your contributions.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #277235 @Lundin Indeed it took quite much to have an official on-topic (and off-topic) section. Based on your input, now we have it [here](https://software.codidact.com/help/on-topic).
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278624 @r~~ I think "Recommendation questions about which tools, libraries or technologies to use or where to find them." refers more to questions like "what tool to edit some video?" rather than questions about tools directly involved in software development (documenting the DDL changes belongs to software...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278470 @Lundin While I cannot find right now a clear scope for Software Developement, your suggestion from here (https://meta.codidact.com/questions/74893#answer-276171) is a very good start.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278559 While I a am little bit familiar with Stack Overflow moderation (I have seen their queues and explanations provided by moderators), it would be very useful if you could provide a some references related to what moderation actually means, some guidelines to help the newbies to moderation. Thanks.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278559 Yes, I have seen this post, but I was not sure what to do. Indeed I would like to see this community grow, so I will take the bait :)
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278473 "Now of course this will directly work only within my network." - this is not clear. Why exactly? I expect the text file to be hosted on a server rather than on the client. You should start by making a little drawing containing the components of your applications, write what they are doing and how th...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278292 @Charlie Brumbaugh‭ Yes, the underlying technical issue is indeed having inserts and selects in the same time. That is why reporting typically has its own database where some aggregates can be recalculated and one almost never gets into trouble like this.
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278278 Oh, it is way uglier than in T-SQL which allows to simply RETURN (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/t-sql/language-elements/return-transact-sql?view=sql-server-ver15)
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278292 Ref. "we have a CRUD plus reporting application that talks to one MySQL database" - is there any way to use a separate database for the reporting application? Another way is to prevent the reports selects from locking the operational tables by using a "no-lock" option (SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATI...
(more)
over 3 years ago
Comment Post #278219 Related: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/434414/what-is-the-most-evil-code-you-have-ever-seen-in-a-production-enterprise-environ/927301
(more)
over 3 years ago