Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Josh Hyattâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #286411 |
@#8046 Thank you for the feedback. I've updated with additional relevant tags. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286411 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286411 |
Interesting. I feel this applies more specifically to isosurfaces than generalized meshes, but it's an interesting idea that could possibly extend to my use case. (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286411 |
I don't know the Codidact policy for comment response delays, and I haven't found any useful info after searching the site. I've started a meta thread [here](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/286436). If you'd like to comment or answer, I'd be interested to hear your thoughts! (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286411 |
"Watertight mesh" is a well-known (standard) term for what I'm describing in various CAD programs. Unfortunately there doesn't seem to be a dedicated computer graphics or CAD Codidact subsite where those familiar with the term might see this. Indeed, a closed polyhedron also fits this description (an... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #286411 | Initial revision | — | almost 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Watertight Mesh Representation A watertight mesh is one which does not have holes, and for which each face has a designated inside and outside. Such a mesh can be "tetrahedralized", has a defined volume, and can be an operand in a polyhedral boolean operation. I'm looking for a method to represent such watertight meshes that re... (more) |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285744 |
Very detailed, useful answer to each part of the question. I appreciate that you pointed out that an unsized iterable can't be used to create a fixed-size array without an intermediate variable-length list. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285742 | Initial revision | — | about 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Kotlin FloatArray from Iterable<Float> Suppose I am using a Java API from Kotlin and I want to call a function that takes a `FloatArray` (represented as `float[]` in Java), and I have an `Iterable` as my input data type. To be more precise, I have a `MutableList>`, and I'm feeding it to the function like this: ```kotlin val myList: Mu... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285579 |
@#53305 I did forget about memory-mapped I/O. In that case, am I correct in assuming that C must be informed that these memory locations should be considered `volatile` to avoid implementations potentially optimizing away reads or writes from them? And is memory-mapped I/O the only way to perform I/O... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285580 |
@#8056 Thank you for the insight. I've updated the question to try and better reflect the intent accordingly. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285579 |
Post edited: Clarify question intent and provide further examples |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285580 |
My question indeed is not concerned with calling conventions unless I am misunderstanding the term. I understand calling convention to be a protocol specific to a particular build environment that ensures proper communication across function calls. Let me try to clarify:
It says [here](https://en.cp... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285580 |
This is certainly a good answer and packed with useful information, and I'm hoping to get more theoretical information than practical. For example, with that `extern` function declaration, from the standard's perspective, what happens when I make a call to `foo`? If the standard is unconcerned with t... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285579 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
C Language Standard Linking Specifications What (if anything) does the C standard have to say about linking objects? My guess is that, because C only defines language->behavior rules, it completely ignores any potential intermediate form the code may take. Obviously, C doesn't guarantee anything about the executable itself because it may well... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285225 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Behavior of Pointer Arithmetic on the Stack Consider the following code: ``` #include int main() { int a = 5; int b; ++(&b + 1); printf("%d\n", a); return 0; } ``` The output is as expected: ``` 6 ``` By creating and incrementing a pointer to `b`, I'm able to access `a`, since `b` is below `a` on the sta... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282155 |
Well-written answer. Thank you for adding the additional example for identifier validation, it's an extremely relevant addition. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282143 |
@elgonzo I've verified your idea. I've defined a regex that I want to match all identifiers that could be used to identify assets within the json, and from there I can specify a schema that I want asset descriptions to match. If you post this as an answer, I'll accept it. Thanks! (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282143 |
@elgonzo Would you go ahead and post this as an answer while I verify it? This looks like exactly what I was asking for. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282143 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Validate All Object Properties with JSON Schema I'm writing a JSON schema to validate asset files for a program. The JSON I need to parse is structured so: ```json { "jobs": { "software-developer": { "job-description": "sw-dev.md:0", "pay": 80000 }, "sales-bro": { "job-description": "sales-bro", "pay": 190000 } }, "people": ... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |