Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for CodeFarmerâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #284975 |
Just to follow up. So it seems that docutils's rst2pseudoxml.py isn't an appropriate syntax-checker/linter for Sphinx documents. It looks like rstcheck is a suitable replacement. https://github.com/myint/rstcheck (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283852 |
Thank you, this is useful answer. The event that started me thinking about this is that I was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I started wondering what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be group... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283849 |
Those are good points. When I posted the question I was thinking of 'only instantiable/concrete classes' but you bring up some additional cases. The reason for the initial question is that I was reading through some code in a language that allows functions as well as classes/object and I go to won... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282685 |
Regarding being borderline off-topic.. The description of the `Writing?` community includes 'technical documentation'. Is this question more appropriate there? If so what would be the proper protocol? Is there a way to move the question to a different community, or should I re-ask it there.. or so... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282685 |
Thanks!, Yes, you have a good point that the current way I'm writing text instructions for interfacing with Graphical Windows systems is reasonable particularly is kept to the discipline of "action on what where". I hesitated to ask this question because I had somewhat the same thought. However, s... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280959 |
Thank you, this is terrific and throught answer. I've tried to improve the question based on the feedback. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280956 |
Okay, I added a code-quotes around the section I'm trying to find. Its `'THIS. THAT.'` (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |