Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for CodeFarmerâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #282685 |
Post edited: Correct missing quote and update the text example. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282685 |
Post edited: Minor spelling correction. |
— | almost 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285865 |
Post edited: Some minor grammer suggestions/improvements |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #285865 |
Suggested edit: Some minor grammer suggestions/improvements (more) |
helpful | about 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285578 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Continuously read from piped input using Vim Maybe passing the piped results through `tail` first would partially work. Use `tail` with the `-f` flag so that tail will continuously its contents. Example: ` | tail -f | vim -` I think you would still need to tell vim to get updates from tail periodically with `:e!` (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285130 |
Post edited: Minor spelling correction |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Suggested Edit | Post #285130 |
Suggested edit: Minor spelling correction (more) |
helpful | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284975 |
Just to follow up. So it seems that docutils's rst2pseudoxml.py isn't an appropriate syntax-checker/linter for Sphinx documents. It looks like rstcheck is a suitable replacement. https://github.com/myint/rstcheck (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284832 |
Post edited: Add the full sphinx-build command |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284832 |
Post edited: Fix a couple of spelling errors |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284832 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Docutils rst2pseudoxml.py reported error: No role entry for "meth" docutils's rst2pseudoxml.py is reporting this error: `Unknown interpreted text role "meth".` even though the build command: `sphinx-build -b html -d build/doctrees source build/html` runs fine and properly displays the method. I suspect I just have some mis-configuration somewhere because the role ... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283849 |
Post edited: Add example languages |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280956 |
Post edited: Fix spelling of 'than' and fix unseen code template segment. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283849 |
Post edited: |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283849 |
Post edited: Try to improve the question by adding additional context based on initial responses. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283852 |
Thank you, this is useful answer. The event that started me thinking about this is that I was reading some code that is a mixture of classes/object and independent functions. I started wondering what things to evaluate when thinking about whether/is some of the independent functions should be group... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283849 |
Those are good points. When I posted the question I was thinking of 'only instantiable/concrete classes' but you bring up some additional cases. The reason for the initial question is that I was reading through some code in a language that allows functions as well as classes/object and I go to won... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283849 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Question | — |
Are there practical reasons for designing a method-only class/object? Are there practical reasons for designing/implementing a method(s)-only class/object? Follow-up background notes: This question is for languages that are not exclusively Object-Oriented, for example, Python and Perl. So languages that can have classes/instances and top-level independent f... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282685 |
Post edited: Removed the 'windows' tag because the question might be confused with the being specific to microsoft windows. |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282685 |
Regarding being borderline off-topic.. The description of the `Writing?` community includes 'technical documentation'. Is this question more appropriate there? If so what would be the proper protocol? Is there a way to move the question to a different community, or should I re-ask it there.. or so... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282685 |
Thanks!, Yes, you have a good point that the current way I'm writing text instructions for interfacing with Graphical Windows systems is reasonable particularly is kept to the discipline of "action on what where". I hesitated to ask this question because I had somewhat the same thought. However, s... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282685 |
Post edited: fix sentence. |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282685 | Initial revision | — | almost 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Are there textual-formats for documenting actions in Graphical Windows systems? I've recently been involved with creating text documentation of steps for workflows in graphical windows systems (and web-pages). These are often somewhat wordy, for example: "Click on the 'Exit' item of the menu in the upper-left corner of the screen". Are there more concise and established pro... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280959 |
Thank you, this is terrific and throught answer. I've tried to improve the question based on the feedback. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280956 |
Post edited: Improve question and examples based on responders feedback |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280956 |
Okay, I added a code-quotes around the section I'm trying to find. Its `'THIS. THAT.'` (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280956 |
Post edited: Highlight the section of the string to extract. |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280956 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #280956 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Python Regex to parse multiple "word. word. word." I'm trying to parse lines like "THIS. THAT..OTHER " so that `"THIS. THAT."` is found. There can be more than one `` separated by a space except no space after the last one. Based on the initial feedback, I've added more example lines to the lines array below. My current results are: ``` re.... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |