Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for ArtOfCodeâ€
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #290645 |
Please see the feedback I gave you on your previous post. You were right to include the code in the question itself rather than as links - links can go out of date. If you look at the formatting help that I linked you to you'll be able to format it correctly. (more) |
— | 3 months ago |
| Comment | Post #287842 |
It's not possible to answer this for such a general case - it depends what you're dealing with. We'd need more detail about the case you're asking for to be able to give sensible answers here. (more) |
— | about 1 year ago |
| Comment | Post #285981 |
If you're using default Devise settings, it'll prevent that for you - that only becomes possible if you explicitly whitelist the `confirmed_at` field. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283689 |
Poking at the server logs, the two edits were submitted within 100ms of each other... not entirely surprising that there was some funny business. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282536 |
Doesn't make this less of a bug, but remember that you can also merge tags if they have the same meaning. Merging data-archiving into archiving would seem to make sense here. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
@Lundin I think we'll admit defeat here for now. I don't have the time to invest in getting this tuned perfectly, and you're right that it's only going to cause more issues. I've turned most rules off except the absolute essentials - let me know if you still have issues. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281496 |
Thanks, @dmckee - yep, one was my test, which I deleted, which is why you don't see it. That you got a notification for the other is interesting, because that indicates it got at least some of the way through. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281496 |
I seem to be able to post comments there fine, and I can't see any errors in the logs. What was the exact content of the comment you were trying to post? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
@Lundin Thanks for the feedback, I'll keep trying to tweak the settings. Let me know if it's still at annoying levels over the next few weeks. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281347 |
You can hack it with a zero-width space... not ideal, but it works. We don't have precise control over how Markdown parsing works, since we use libraries for it. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280956 |
Not entirely clear on what parts of the line you want the regex to match? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280514 |
Right, case doesn't matter - I still get the notification there. Autocomplete is in the works (Mith has gone into more detail below) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280514 |
@yaskur like this - just use the username without any spaces (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279716 |
Norepro on that jQuery breakage here, so perhaps it's something to do either with your setup, or with theirs as it relates to your request. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279716 |
`1:21 GET https://code.jquery.com/jquery-2.2.2.min.js net::ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS` is your problem - the jQuery server is broken and isn't serving you a working copy of jQuery (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279716 |
Do you have JavaScript enabled? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278780 |
It's a non-expiring cache, @Alexei - only shows up in specific situations, but that's one of them. Most of the time it's correctly in sync, but every now and then... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278780 |
Caaaaaaaaaache. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277158 |
Just realised I never actually responded to this. It's not one we thought of (the 2FA system was copied over from another, older, implementation of mine from before it was a recommended practice), but it's definitely one we should do. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277152 |
@Lundin This is much like a private beta for a new SE site; those things have not been defined yet, because they can and should be decided here on Meta by the folks who want to participate here - this community belongs to those people. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277152 |
@Lundin this site has an initial scope, which was hammered out on Meta.CD in the site proposal - it's in the [welcome post](https://software.codidact.com/q/277141) and at the top of the Q&A category. That can be changed here on Meta if that's useful. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277152 |
@Ringi I'm not sure what you mean. This site is not run by Stack Exchange, if that's what you're worried about - the folks who run this site are not the same people as those who can make decisions on Stack Exchange sites. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277148 |
Why the double-select? Why not just a single subquery, as in "where not in (select where is_excluded = 1)"? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |