Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Users Search
Help Dashboard Sign In Sign Up
Q&A Code Reviews Meta
Meta
Posts Tags Edits
Ask Question

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Can we migrate office suite related questions to the Power Users community?

Parent

Can we migrate office suite related questions to the Power Users community?

+7
−0

Power Users has just been launched and I remember that Software Development has some content related to office suite usage (example).

Is it OK to migrate these questions to the Power Users community?

discussion content-migration
posted almost 3 years ago
user card
Alexei‭
4928 reputation 111 101 679 474
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
Post
+4
−0

I went ahead and made a proposal on Power User that a separate category for office suites should be made. I suggest that we wait and see where that proposal lands.

If a category for these questions is made, we can go ahead and migrate. (Such a category would also soften the "bump blow" that comes from migrating some I dunno, some 50 questions(?), from here to there.)

In the meantime we can discuss overlapping scopes. I think most agree that excel formulas etc are more suited for Power User. But in the above proposal I also identified two more overlaps with this site: VBA and MS Access. These sit in some grey area between Software Development and Power Users. We know from SO that what to do with VBA (and excel) questions were a constant source of conflict. Better to discuss sooner rather than later what to do with such questions.

EDIT as per 2021-06-08:

My proposal wasn't well-received and it's unlikely that a category will get created. So I'd say just go ahead and migrate. If someone whines about bumping/bombardment of office suite questions, well they have been warned that could have been avoided.

posted almost 3 years ago
3y ago
user card
Lundin‭
8077 reputation 33 109 919 152
History
Why does this post require moderator attention?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Even if there is no dedicated category, we should do something with these questions (1 comment)
General comments (5 comments)
General comments
Estela‭ wrote almost 3 years ago
copy link

Regarding the frontier. I would put it at Turing completeness. So Excel's formulae (without LAMBDA) go to Power User. VBA to Software Development. That being said... Using a limited subset of the features of a language can make it non Turing complete. And people commonly using such subset will feel they are better suited to Power Users even if the whole language is Turing complete (as it happens now with Excel formulae once LAMBDA is included). So some arbitrarity is unavoidable.

Lundin‭ wrote almost 3 years ago
copy link

@Estela‭ I don't think we can use that as a distinction. HTML, SQL, batch script and so on is on-topic here.

Estela‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago
copy link

batch script is Turing complete. HTML... I am not an expert, but it is or it was a description language as opposed to a programming language. So asking if HTML is Turing complete is like asking if an apple is Turing complete. It still has a place here because programming is not the only thing relevant to programming. As for SQL, it is Turing complete with CTE and not Turing complete wihout CTE. SQL is actually a good argument against my proposal since SQL without CTE is beyond any ...

Estela‭ wrote almost 3 years ago
copy link

... doubt relevant here. Same happens with regular expresions, which are not turing complete but are a programming language. Hmmm, yeah, scrap my idea.

Estela‭ wrote almost 3 years ago
copy link

That being said. And this applies to office tools. I would say that Turning Completeness is sufficient to qualify but not necessary. So if something, like VBA, is Turing complete we need look no more. It belongs here.