Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Q&A

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on How to unittest method that involves contacting remote servers?

Parent

How to unittest method that involves contacting remote servers?

+6
−1

Let's say I have this class:

class myService {
    private boolean foo(T arg) { return arg == 42; }

    public Response bar(U arg) {
        if(foo(U.field)) {
            return Response.status(Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST).build();
        }

        // Code that contacts a remote server
    }
}

I want to unittest this with Junit. But there are some problems. I'm actually mainly interested in testing foo(), but that one is private. I could make it public, but I really don't want to do that just so that the test class can access it. I could also write a wrapper around bar() but again, it feels weird to modify the API for this purpose.

It works fine to test test cases that should fail, which in this case means that foo returns true. But in the case that foo returns false, we will reach the code that contacts remote servers, and that's not desirable.

How should I refactor this so that I can test foo via bar regardless if foo returns true or false?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

DI? (5 comments)
Post
+6
−0

I'm actually mainly interested in testing foo()

Ok, so let's do that.

I could make it public, but I really don't want to do that just so that the test class can access it

Java has 4 different access modes: private, default access, protected, and public. The typical solution is to use default access, and put your unit test into the same package. This pattern is common enough that Guava provides @VisibleForTesting to document why access has been relaxed.

Alternatively, you could move the foo method to a different class, so it can be invoked independently without cluttering the API of the class that uses it.

How to unittest method that involves contacting remote servers?

Generally, by moving the code contacting remote servers into its own method, and mocking that method in tests. To inject the mock, one usually uses dependency injection.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

1 comment thread

Works for me (1 comment)
Works for me
klutt‭ wrote almost 3 years ago · edited almost 3 years ago

Using protected made a lot of sense, and that's what I ended up doing. Also mocked a lot.