Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Do we want a wiki (or similar) alongside Q&A?

Parent

Do we want a wiki (or similar) alongside Q&A?

+11
−2

In addition to Q&A, Codidact supports another post type, article. Articles can be used for blog posts, wiki pages, and other resources. Articles, like questions, use tags, so searching for a tag would find them alongside questions. Articles, unlike questions, do not have answers, though they do have comments.

You can see articles in use on the Meta blog and on Cooking's recipes.

On Some Other site, the only options for sharing information about a topic are tag wikis (not very visible) and self-answered questions. There's nothing wrong with self-answered questions, but sometimes you have information you want to share and have to fabricate a question to support that answer, and that can be challenging.

Does this community want to have a category to hold articles, whether a wiki model or something else?

I'm not advocating one way or the other. What the community is doing now seems to be working fine; there's no need to change anything. New tools enable other options, so I want to make sure folks know about the option. If people are interested in pursuing it there's more discussion that should happen to work out the model (and name the category).

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

1 comment thread

General comments (3 comments)
Post
+4
−1

I hear the walk-before-we-run argument. I think this would be a good thing to try once we reach running speed, though.

Personally, I don't like self-answered questions; I think they're an awkward fit for Q&A sites. I'm primarily here to scratch my itch to help people—when I see a question that's relevant to my interests, only to realize that the asker never wanted help with the question at all, I feel a little let down. Spreading knowledge proactively is a noble goal and I don't want to discourage it, but I think there ought to be a more fit-for-purpose way to do it than the self-answer approach, which I think is kind of a hack.

The proper comparison with articles here would not be Wikipedia articles, IMO, but articles on GitHub wikis for specific projects. Wikipedia is a bad place for rando project documentation because it doesn't meet notability requirements. GitHub wikis are a good place to put that documentation, but GitHub issues are, in some projects' opinions, bad places to ask questions, and so you see a lot of README.md instructions asking users to consult both the wiki on GitHub and Some Other site when they have questions. Enabling articles would let projects define a one-stop shop for knowledge base articles and Q&A, which I think would make a certain amount of sense.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Self answering not awkward (2 comments)
General comments (3 comments)
Self answering not awkward
matthewsnyder‭ wrote over 1 year ago

I disagree that self-answering is "awkward". I get where you're coming from, but if you think about it, it's actually extremely natural. Self answering questions is one of the most popular teaching styles from K-12 to college and beyond. Everyone is familiar with it. The ancient Greeks used it to elaborate their grandest ideas. If done skillfully and with care, it's a great way to effectively convey knowledge.

r~~‭ wrote over 1 year ago

That's not what I said. The general concept of answering your own questions isn't awkward, but it's an awkward fit for the existing usage patterns of a Q&A site. It doesn't integrate well into the system of voting on questions and answers individually, or the notifications that get generated on multiple-person Q&A exchanges. My position is that self-answered questions are more like a monologue than a two-person Q&A exchange, and that there should be a separate format with a designed-for-that-purpose presentation for (on-topic) monologues, as opposed to reusing the Q&A format because it's the hammer we have and anything can approximate a nail if you hit it hard enough.