Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »
Meta

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Comments on Tag creation/deletion criteria for Software Development?

Parent

Tag creation/deletion criteria for Software Development?

+4
−0

Ok so we have fairly lax tagging rules here, as do most Codidact sites. Recently the Electrical Engineering community has started a clean-up of strange and off-topic tags. I wrote this over there: Tag creation/deletion criteria.

Those who have a background at SO might recognize the huge system problems SO has with "tag burnination" described in the question of the linked post. I do not wish that Software Development makes the same mistakes as SO did, and that we can dispose of bad tags much more effortlessly.

But some manner of rule set is still needed before someone goes ahead and deletes tags - from the link, I made this draft for a tag renaming/deletion criteria:

A tag must fulfill all of the below requirements or it may get renamed or deleted:

  1. A tag must be named appropriately, considering Tag naming guidelines.
  2. A tag must be on-topic, meaning it has to be related to Electrical Engineering.
  3. A tag must be unambiguous in the context of Electrical Engineering. It should not mean two very different things at once.
  4. A tag must add at least some meaningful information regarding what the question is about.
  5. A tag should not be too localized/specialized, but about some well-known term in Electrical Engineering. If it is unlikely that other posts will ever use the tag, it is too localized.

Replace Electrical Engineering with Software Development and this could as well apply here too, since this is a quite similar technical engineering community.

Should Software Engineering adopt similar guidelines and tag deletion criteria?

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.
Why should this post be closed?

0 comment threads

Post
+2
−0

Yes, but with some notes

I think this a good idea, but we will need to provide more details and agree on some details.

  1. A tag must be named appropriately, considering Tag naming guidelines.

I have mixed feelings about using uppercase in the tag names. I am inclined to switch to using the original naming (e.g. all uppercase for acronyms), but this goes against the reflex created by communities such as SE ones. This is also supported by Codidact tagging search functionality (when editing the post) which is case-insensitive.

  1. A tag must be on-topic, meaning it has to be related to Software Development.
  2. A tag must be unambiguous in the context of Software Development. It should not mean two very different things at once.

This is clear to me.

  1. A tag must add at least some meaningful information regarding what the question is about.

This requires more details and I guess it is tightly related to Deciding if a concept can be materialized to a tag meta question which needs more feedback from the community.

  1. A tag should not be too localized/specialized, but about some well-known term in Software Development. If it is unlikely that other posts will ever use the tag, it is too localized.

This is also clear and I think we should adopt it.

History
Why does this post require attention from curators or moderators?
You might want to add some details to your flag.

2 comment threads

Upper case (2 comments)
Meaningful info (1 comment)
Upper case
Lundin‭ wrote about 1 year ago · edited about 1 year ago

I'm so used at SO that I didn't even consider that Codidact allows case-sensitive tags until very recently. After getting used to the idea, it sounds like it could be a very useful thing to a programming community in particular - few communities care about upper/lower case but we ought to. As a random example, CHAR ought to be a hint that the tag is for SQL, whereas char would be a hint that the tag is for C. And lots of languages like to use CamelCase for library functions etc. I'm not saying that we should have different tags with same name but different case, but upper/lower case might help with making tags less ambiguous.

Alexei‭ wrote about 1 year ago

Ref. to "I didn't even consider that Codidact allows case-sensitive tags until very recently." - If you write an existing tag using a different case, Codidact will not create a new tag, but use the existing one (i.e. case insensitive search and match).

Ref. to the char vs CHAR example, I think that might trick newbies which would receive both in a tag search. If I see char, I understand that it is related to the generic char data type and the other tags should do the disambiguation (c or sql in this case).