Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for President James K. Polk
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #290330 |
Step 4 is correct, but I think the wording "actual location ... actual domain name" used here can lead to significant confusion. (more) |
— | 5 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289725 |
Have you tried pickle protocol 0? It's pretty ugly and I would choose json over it any day for readability, but it is human-readable text. (more) |
— | 8 months ago |
| Comment | Post #284078 |
This can be a tricky problem that is much harder than it appears. First off, what is the scope of your signing keys? How many are there? Is there a different one for each of your devices, or is there a single one for all? Can one customer's signed code run on another's IoT device? What is the value o... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278932 |
Yep, self-answered Q&A was exactly what I was planning to do. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278914 |
Ok, sounds good. I can game that by seeing an SO question I want to answer, asking a similar question here and answering it myself, then quoting my answer here in my answer there. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278910 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
Growing software.codidact I've been thinking about how the community might bring more contributors to software.codidact. One of the ways is to simply pitch codidact in questions, answers, and comments in stackoverflow. I'm not sure if that is explicitly forbidden there, or frowned upon. Is making explicit pitches for software... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278895 |
With full-feature IDEs becoming common-place you might think the argument for always-braces is weakened. I'm not so sure. However, the legendary [goto fail](https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/02/22/applebug.html) bug still looms as a mammoth counterexample. One assumes that Apple's developers used a... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278591 |
It's best to go in with realistic expectations. On stackoverflow a significant percentage of questions are from users who are not at all interested in the site's vision or rules, and will create a new account for each question they ask. stackoverflow and politics SE are so different I doubt the lesso... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278303 |
I think the question is much closer to your first bullet than to your last, and is thus on-topic. It's called the *developer* console for a reason. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278751 |
Note that this code can be read, but cannot be run without `MathExt.gcd()` and `LRUCache`. It is relatively easy to supply my own gcd function, but not so easy to supply an implementation for `LRUCache`. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278751 |
Not really relevant to your question but I've seen claims that implementers have found the ancient Sieve of Eratosthenes to be faster than Atkin's sieve. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278751 |
YAGNI == "you aren't going to need it", for those who might not be in the know (I wasn't!). (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278468 |
I agree. I think code review questions should *not* be in their own site, they belong right with all the other software development questions unless it should prove to be completely unworkable. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |