Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for FoggyFinder
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #290226 |
I didn't use paket for quite a while. Don't remember I ever used it with modern dotnet so not sure. I'll try to check it on weekends. No promise though. (more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #290173 |
Not related to the Q but have you considered using Avalonia instead of WinUi?
(more) |
— | 6 months ago |
| Comment | Post #289016 |
Sadly but community seems [voted against](https://software.codidact.com/posts/278189) Articles. I suppose we have to wait until Codidact gets more recognition and we could re-vote. (more) |
— | 9 months ago |
| Comment | Post #286000 |
@#61308 there is clear "and" (more) |
— | 10 months ago |
| Comment | Post #288121 |
Do you mean something similar to MAUI? [Configure multi-targeting](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/maui/platform-integration/configure-multi-targeting) (more) |
— | 12 months ago |
| Comment | Post #286164 |
You already got correct answers but to me it just doesn't look like right architecture. You either get inefficient structure (since you have to copy mutable list over and over again) or model class with an observable property that logically doesn't fit there. I think it'd better to move `AllValues` p... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285839 |
I believe it happens because your data doesn't throw exception. The true difference will be noticed only when you're actually encounter overflow.
If you replace your generator with something that returns big numbers you'd see the difference. And don't forget to adjust `GetSum` method:
```csharp... (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285784 |
I understand why Q received some downvotes. You didn't provide enough information to replicate what you've described in the Q. I'm certain that if you add additional information (see another comments for detaisl) downvotes would be removed. (more) |
— | about 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285438 |
@#55039 Can you please be more specific? Both Avalonia & CoDidact projects are open-source. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285067 |
If you've encountered an error I suggest creating a separate Q here with steps to reproduce (if it is possible) or just providing some information that is required to investigate the root of the issue (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284806 |
Disclaimer: I don't know enough about Python to suggest alternative approaches.
Anyway, when it comes to performance Qs I'd recommend providing full working MCVE since it's easily to overlook something. It might turn out that a culprit lays in a totally different area. (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284345 |
Not quite sure but maybe you're looking for [Array.GetUpperBound(Int32)](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.array.getupperbound?view=net-5.0) method? (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282558 |
One downvote is mine due to reasons that were indicated in comments above. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282270 |
__I think Code Reviews is for this type of question.__ @Istiak No, Code Review is about improving, receiving feedback in general for code that basically works. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282272 |
__But, what i want now that is new category or site for office suites.__
Regarding category there is Q about that: [Office suites category](https://powerusers.codidact.com/posts/281809) and there is proposal regarding new community: [Site for office suites](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277548) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282272 |
__SO has over than 1000 Q's on Office Suites. So, does it mean it is on-topic here?__
Of course, not. The point is PU allows such Qs and they're ontopic there
(more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282270 |
I can try to help you to understand what went wrong but I think it would be better if you add some comments to the algorithm so I (or anyone else around) can follow your thoughts. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282270 |
Disclaimer: I don't know Python. There're couple of errors. One of them, most obvious, `x=y=z=[]` - you actually have 1 reference instead of 3 independent list. You can use `copy` or assign the new list to each variable. The second error is that fact that your second loop is the same for all iteratio... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282008 |
Also, [Android Studio — How to replace custom templates](https://blog.thefuntasty.com/android-studio-how-to-replace-custom-templates-6329562e6131) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282008 |
I'm not a Java developer and I know literally nothing about Android Studio but after a little of research I've found this [issue](https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/154531807) so it seems like it is impossible to create custom template currently. There was a link to [Geminio](https://github.com/h... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281769 |
_Anyone care to explain the downvotes? I think I answered the question quite well. Only problem I see is that perhaps the question doesn't really belong.._
Exactly! The answer is great but it is off-topic here. That's why one downvote is mine. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281730 |
@kolaa Can you please ask this Q on [TA](https://topanswers.xyz/csharp) ? I'll do my best to help you when I have time. It would be easier to help if you provide test values though. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281730 |
If we will close all questions the community will be dead. To be honest I see less and less reasons to participate here. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281530 |
__However, the subsequent comments seem to be a debate around available Wikipedia translations and how an answer would look like, rather than suggesting how to improve the question__ And who said it's forbidden? What's the point to have a comment section if you can't actually write there ? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281308 |
@Lundin But the Q is not about explaining a code. TS is asking what tool was used to obfuscate the code. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280920 |
I.e. in practice you can write `vehicles.Select(v => v.HasRegistration = vinList.Contains(v.VIN)).ToArray();` or something but you shouldn't do that. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280920 |
Nope. LINQ is about `receiving` and not `mutating`. You could use `.ForEach` though: `vehicles.ForEach(v => v.HasRegistration = vinList.Contains(v.VIN));` (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280665 |
btw, why do you have such restrictions? What's wrong with calling `base` inside of `EntityFrameworkContext`? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280665 |
@Marc.2377 I doubt it is possible. See [Using generics in generic type constraint #3208](https://github.com/dotnet/csharplang/discussions/3208) for details. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280665 |
@Peter Taylor the link you provided is referenced to `EF` while here it's about `EF Core`. Correct link would be: [Add](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/microsoft.entityframeworkcore.dbcontext.add?view=efcore-3.1#Microsoft_EntityFrameworkCore_DbContext_Add__1___0_) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280665 |
ah, the goal is avoiding something like that `EntityEntry IDbContextable<EntityFrameworkContext, EntityEntry>.Add<TEntity>(TEntity entity) => base.Add(entity);` in the `EntityFrameworkContext` class? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280665 |
Not sure I follow the Q. `TEntityEntry` type isn't generic. Why can't you just write `public TEntityEntry Add<TEntity>([NotNullAttribute] TEntity entity) where TEntity : class;`? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280605 |
There is such suggestion already: [Can comment input fields be vertically scalable?](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277177) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280601 |
@gzi98 I suppose that's a totally different Q related to mysql itself. I'll try to address it later (it's near midnight here) but I suggest creating a separate Q anyway. Or I misunderstand your Q and the issue isn't with sql itself but with Dapper or organizing code in geneal? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280601 |
@gzi98 There is no right answer to the Q. Someone think it's against the pattern but other have quite the opposite opinion.
Anyway, I see no reason to create a proxy for object that can't be mutated "outside".
But I'm a purist when it comes to __creating__ objects. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280601 |
@gzi98 I see no reason to create duplicate types merely to avoid connection between `Model` and `View` in case of displaying data. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280599 |
I wrote some thoughts but it would be better if you provide MCVE rather than some random parts of code.
Let me explain:
* You ask about filter so part that related to DB shouldn't be included at all.
* It's unclear how exactly `BaseViewModel` class looks.
* What's a purpose of `Technical_Best... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280527 |
You can skip `nameof(...)` at all and use `CallerMemberName` attribute (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |