Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Monica Cellio
Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
Comment | Post #278892 |
Fixed back in mid-November, but I missed it in GitHub and thus didn't status-tag it then. Sorry for the reporting delay. (more) |
— | almost 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278892 |
Post edited: |
— | almost 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #279853 |
[Code Golf here on Codidact](https://codegolf.codidact.com/categories/50) has a sandbox. They have it set up so that you post articles (not questions) in the sandbox, get feedback in comments, edit, get more comments, etc, and when you're done you can cut/paste your challenge in the main "challenges... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #279834 |
Post edited: replaced algorithms tag with dicom at OP's request; added Android which seems relevant |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #279714 |
Another argument in favor of changing "last activity" to something more specific -- answered, edited, closed, answer deleted... (There is a GH issue about this somewhere.) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #279609 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #279609 |
It's related to the [abilities update](https://meta.codidact.com/questions/279504); there's some DB reconciliation that still needs to happen. I remember seeing at least one answer there and I think two. It's not lost, just not properly restored yet. Sorry! (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #279449 |
Is the failure happening at the P4 checkout time, or in a cleanup phase at the end? And do you rerun the job in the same directory each time, or do you use a new scratch directory each time? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #279481 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Add link dialog should capture enter This was a tricky one to diagnose, but it's fixed now. Thanks for the report. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278393 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278952 |
It's fine to report issues on community metas; we don't want to require people to go sign up for GitHub or Discord just to be able to communicate with us. Granted, on Software Dev the odds are decent that people are already on GH. If Alexei doesn't file a GH issue then one of us will do it in one o... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278914 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Growing software.codidact Speaking personally (not as a Codidact admin): One low-key way to promote this community there is to cite it in answers. If you see a question there that you want to answer, see if it's here too. Maybe there's already an answer here, or maybe you want to write an answer. You can then write an a... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278843 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278847 |
Threaded comments are the driver for the planned comments revamp. I think that's more than "most likely". :-) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278804 |
Or, if there are a lot or they're tightly coupled or they need to be reproducible, you can put them in a config file and pass the name of that file as an arg. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278727 |
@Moshi UrlRewrite is an engine but *URL rewriting* is a more general practice. Should the engine have its own tag or is that too specific? I don't know. (I mean, would we have a ClassNotFoundException tag as opposed to "exceptions" and maybe "class-loader"?) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278728 |
Yeah, when it's the name of a product and the tag is about that specific product, you kind of need to use the name even if you wouldn't otherwise... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278727 |
It sounds like there are two aspects there: URL rewriting, which is general, and IIS, which this question was specifically about and/or does something special with URL rewriting. Should there be two tags, url-rewriting and iis, both applied to this question but might be used separately in other cont... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278454 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278470 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278620 |
Hi! When you get a chance, could you send email to info@codidact.org so we can discuss? Thanks. (Someday we will get "contact user without prejudice, i.e. not down the warning path" implemented in the UI, but that day is not today...) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278624 |
My intent with the question was to describe what I want and ask how to get it. I assumed there might be some tool that does that, but I tried to be specific enough that it would work. I agree that a question like "what source-control system should I use?" with no specific requirements wouldn't fit.... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278606 |
@Lundin I made some edits based on your comments. Is that better? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278606 |
Post edited: responding to comments |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278606 |
@Lundin good question, which I hadn't considered. Questions about tools (like javadoc, git, etc) were on-topic on SO, so I made a logical leap here which might not be warranted. At the core I'm trying to *solve a technical problem* and don't know if a tool exists at all. That feels a little differ... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278606 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278606 |
@Canina this is to support examples in published documentation about a SQL platform. I'll edit. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278606 |
Post edited: |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278606 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Question | — |
How can I generate documentation from comments in SQL DDL? I have some SQL scripts that contain DDL to create tables and schemas for a database. I'd like to be able to comment this SQL and then use those comments to generate output documentation (in HTML). I want to be able to document the purpose of each table and table column, and have the output be nice... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278591 |
And a key difference is that we're young and small, while SO isn't. People on SO resist investing time to help people because there's *so much*; it probably feels like bailing out the ocean with a thimble. *We* can get off on the right foot and grow organically, helping people along the way. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278559 |
@Alexei in terms of the broad task, it's what I said in the question. In terms of details like using the tools and guidelines for when to use them, we have help for that. Plus a team of people who are available for questions as needed. We're not going to strand you. :-) (Could you get in touch wi... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278470 |
I agree; that list from the proposal is a great starting point. (Upvoted it back then, still support it.) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278470 |
I've made a couple nominations to get the ball rolling. I hope to see more. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278560 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Who should the moderators be? I nominate Lundin, who is very active on main and meta, has proposed some initiatives on meta, and is well-positioned to help us firm up sometimes-fuzzy scope and help this young community grow. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278559 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Who should the moderators be? I nominate Alexei, who has a body of well-received posts on Q&A and meta, both asking and answering, and seems interested in helping to organize and expand this fledgling community. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278470 |
That's fair @r~~. This community came about a little differently from the others; there were lots of general requests for a software site but we didn't have a cohesive community. Now that we're here and have some participants and some questions getting answers, how should we proceed to best move fo... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278468 |
Tangent, but I don't have another way to contact you: Alexei, you're pretty active here, so I want to make sure you're aware of https://software.codidact.com/questions/278470. Interested? (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278556 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: Should we have a Code Review Section / category? Proposal, based on the feedback here so far: because code-review questions have special rules, create a category. This allows (and we would need proposed text from the community for): - Category description: that short text at the top of the posts list; can contain links. - Posting guidance: y... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278540 |
Post edited: updated with info from comments, thanks! |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278540 |
@elgonzo ah! Thanks. I did not find that in the actual documentation, and I didn't read the code. (Will edit the info from comments into this post in a bit.) (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278470 |
I think the body of questions that's developing, including which ones get closed, will help inform scope. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Comment | Post #278539 |
I asked this question a while ago on SO and it keeps generating activity, so apparently it's helping people. I'd like to help people (and make any improvements to it) here, so I brought it over. (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |
Edit | Post #278540 | Initial revision | — | about 4 years ago |
Answer | — |
A: How do I configure Jenkins to strip the leading “origin/” in git branch parameter? For the git branch parameter, set Branch Filter to: origin/(.) I found the parentheses to be counter-intuitive, because if you don't specify a filter you get: . (No parens.) If you are filtering stuff out, you use parens to indicate the part to keep. The parens indicate a capt... (more) |
— | about 4 years ago |