Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edit | Post #286685 | Initial revision | — | over 2 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Reaction comment doesn't appear if previous comment for retracted reaction was deleted I wrote this in a comment on the GitHub issue and would be interested in input: > I can think of two fixes, both in the reaction-handling code: > > 1. Check for an existing thread (as it does now) and then, if it's deleted, undelete it. Problem: this can resurrect something that a moderator deci... (more) |
— | over 2 years ago |
| Comment | Post #286411 |
@#53629 would the question benefit from a tag that captures the CAD aspect? If so, could you suggest one? (I don't know this space so I wouldn't want to guess.) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278868 |
You posted this a long time ago and I thought we were tracking it on GitHub, but if so I can't find it. I conclude that I failed to create the ticket, for which I apologize. I've done so now here: https://github.com/codidact/qpixel/issues/777. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285999 |
I guess it depends what the 400 lines contain. :-) I would personally skip boilerplate stuff to help readers focus on the important parts, but that might be a matter of formatting. It sounds like the asker might have run into an overall limit on post size; I'm not sure what that is, but I think 30,... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285999 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should I post a link to the Github repo for code reviews? Welcome! It's best if the code being reviewed is here on the site, for ease of reference and defense against link rot. That sounds like a sizable program; are there key parts you'd like review on, as opposed to the whole thing? You could include the GitHub link for anybody who wants to run it as... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278625 |
Post edited: |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285894 |
Thanks for this feedback, and I'm sorry for the confusion with the buttons. I guess them being outside the bounding box for the thread isn't clear enough because they're also pretty close to that box. We are planning to make improvements to comments, including being able to fully expand a thread in... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285829 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we allow questions about software quality assurance? My personal opinion (I am not speaking for Codidact) is that we named the community "Software Development", not "Programming". Testing, both unit testing done by the developer and functional/performance/integration testing done (usually) by testers, is part of the software-development process writ l... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285035 |
@#54648 sorry, we haven't gotten self-serve deletion in place yet. There's a "contact us" link at the bottom of the page; could you send us a request that way, either the support portal or email, and we'll route it to the right person? Thanks, and sorry to see you go. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285035 |
The primary challenge with any new community is attracting people. We're not trying to clone SO; rather, we're trying to learn from our experiences there and elsewhere as we build something new -- new both in terms of software and in terms of the community mindset. We have the opportunity to do thi... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285485 |
Nice! Also, today I learned about `-ip` -- that sounds really useful. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285455 | Initial revision | — | about 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Tracking what users are searching in a content management system Every URL served by your web site is recorded in your web server logs. You could brute-force your way through it by grepping for whatever the prefix is for your search URLs (for example, `/search?query=`), but if you're using a tool or package to build and run your web site (the question title refer... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285399 |
You could mention categories as a way of separating related content and, in particular, that Software Dev has one for code reviews. Software Dev isn't currently using other post types (like a blog with articles), so that's probably not something to bring up for promoting this community.
Maybe men... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285398 |
Also, the foundation account is happy to post or share stuff, so please let us know if you do post things on LinkedIn that we can amplify. Thanks! (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285368 |
I wonder if a pre-commit hook can test whether a file is already in the repo. If so, then you could write one to block new additions -- at the cost of some hassle when you actually do want to add a new PDF image to your source. Hmm. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285368 |
@#36377 actually, on further thought, a git commit hook doesn't seem right. Those files shouldn't be in your repo to begin with (that's your goal), so is something auto-adding them to the commit? If you never say `git add unwanted.pdf` then it shouldn't get there, but some git clients (like Tortois... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285368 |
I agree that last option is not great. It's fragile and will bloat .gitignore over time, since the script can never safely *remove* things, only *add* them. Segregated build output is best; git hook to prevent committing unwanted PDFs would be second-best I think. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #285366 |
Do you have to build the LaTeX output into the source directory? Or can you segregate it and then ignore the build directory? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285222 |
Post edited: fixed title damaged in otherwise-good edit |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #281229 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281229 |
Good catch, thanks. Status-overcome-by-events, I guess. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #285035 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Question | — |
How can we grow this community? Codidact's communities have a lot of great content that is helping people on the Internet. Our communities are small, though, and sustainable communities depend on having lots of active, engaged participants. The folks already here are doing good work; our challenge is to find more people like you ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284872 |
That's a good point; we should have a way of letting mods know that we've modified base help topics, so they can review and apply changes if they like. We do this so rarely that I never think of it. :-) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #284872 |
In case this helps with findability (or linkability) in the future:
As a moderator you should be able to edit the "how to ask a great question" topic in the help. The cost of editing is that if we update the central copy in the future you won't get the updates (we do not attempt merges), but tha... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284904 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Specify framework / library version in the answer When I first saw this I thought this would be a use case for being able to apply tags to answers (which I've brought up before on Meta, IIRC). But version ranges are a little different, and I don't think you want to necessarily create tags for every version of something just so people can tag answer... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #284587 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Are general questions (hopefully resulting in comprehensive, 'canonical' answers) in scope This sounds like useful content to me. I defer to the community on how best to achieve that; I'm here to offer another option from the platform side, in case it's useful. Codidact support articles in addition to questions and answers. An article is a top-level post type that doesn't have childre... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283861 |
Thanks @#53078. If things change in the future please do let us know. And either way, I appreciate your participation here. Your answers have helped me and, I assume, many others. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283671 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283667 |
@#53196 I don't think +0/-0 and +3/-3 have the same score. Well, they're not supposed to; I just checked that post and they all say 0.5. **Edit:** I was wrong; according to our help +N/-N is a score of 0.5. I thought the controversy had an impact. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283667 |
[This post on Meta](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/279573) has, at this writing, a +3/-3 sandwiched between two +0/-0s, but they're not in age order either. Hmm. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #283198 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283198 |
We think this is fixed now. Can you try again? Sorry for the inconvenience. (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #283001 |
This is a tangent I know, but why `.dup` on the second case (the char[])? (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282870 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #279713 |
Post edited: |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282870 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Allow filtering search for only Meta (or any other category) You can now add "category:###" to a search, where ### is the number in the URL for the category, to restrict the search to one category. For example, Software Dev Q&A is 38 and Code Review is 44. I've just pushed an update to the search help, where you can find more information about this and oth... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282841 |
I defer to the community's moderators on whether the thread should be deleted (I'm a Codidact admin, not a Software Dev mod). (For some reason I can't edit this in right now, so adding this comment.) (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Edit | Post #282841 | Initial revision | — | over 3 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Unfair accusation in a comment and consequent loss of *actual* reputation I looked at your answer and those comments, skimmed the Wikipedia page, and I do not see direct copies. OOP is a fundamental topic, widely taught and widely written about. It's not surprising to me that many independent explanations take similar approaches. To some people that probably looks like ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282807 |
When we make code changes that affect the database (like adding/updating tables), we run DB upgrades as part of the deployment. I assume, but have not personally verified (and wouldn't know what to look for), that this is something that's baked into the code in the public repository somehow, either ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282752 |
Thanks. We usually do backports by cherry-picking the commit to master (so, merge feature-x to master, then cherry-pick that commit to release-foo). That wouldn't work in this case because feature-A isn't coming to master in its own commit, but we could cherry-pick the last commit on that branch in... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282752 |
Thank you! That explanation is very helpful, and I think you've answered my other question. In the future I might need to merge feature-A, without feature-B, into a previous release's branch, so I was looking for a solution that wouldn't pollute that. I think in that case I'd just merge feature-A ... (more) |
— | over 3 years ago |