Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Monica Cellio
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #278470 |
I've made a couple nominations to get the ball rolling. I hope to see more. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278560 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Who should the moderators be? I nominate Lundin, who is very active on main and meta, has proposed some initiatives on meta, and is well-positioned to help us firm up sometimes-fuzzy scope and help this young community grow. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278559 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Who should the moderators be? I nominate Alexei, who has a body of well-received posts on Q&A and meta, both asking and answering, and seems interested in helping to organize and expand this fledgling community. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278470 |
That's fair @r~~. This community came about a little differently from the others; there were lots of general requests for a software site but we didn't have a cohesive community. Now that we're here and have some participants and some questions getting answers, how should we proceed to best move fo... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278468 |
Tangent, but I don't have another way to contact you: Alexei, you're pretty active here, so I want to make sure you're aware of https://software.codidact.com/questions/278470. Interested? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278556 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Should we have a Code Review Section / category? Proposal, based on the feedback here so far: because code-review questions have special rules, create a category. This allows (and we would need proposed text from the community for): - Category description: that short text at the top of the posts list; can contain links. - Posting guidance: y... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278540 |
Post edited: updated with info from comments, thanks! |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278540 |
@elgonzo ah! Thanks. I did not find that in the actual documentation, and I didn't read the code. (Will edit the info from comments into this post in a bit.) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278470 |
I think the body of questions that's developing, including which ones get closed, will help inform scope. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278539 |
I asked this question a while ago on SO and it keeps generating activity, so apparently it's helping people. I'd like to help people (and make any improvements to it) here, so I brought it over. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278540 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How do I configure Jenkins to strip the leading “origin/” in git branch parameter? For the git branch parameter, set Branch Filter to: origin/(.) I found the parentheses to be counter-intuitive, because if you don't specify a filter you get: . (No parens.) If you are filtering stuff out, you use parens to indicate the part to keep. The parens indicate a capt... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278539 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
How do I configure Jenkins to strip the leading “origin/” in git branch parameter? I'm using Jenkins with a branch parameter to specify the branch to build from. Other stuff downstream needs the branch name to not have the leading "origin/" -- just "feature/blahblah" or "bugfix/12345" or similar. The advanced settings for the parameter let me specify a branch filter via regex, but ... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278472 |
Right now close reasons are per-community, not per-community-per-category. We could adopt a convention like "[CR] reason" and "[Q&A] reason" for the ones that are unique to a category, until category-specific reasons are possible. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278468 |
A category can define tags that get special styling, like bug/discussion/feature-request/support here on meta. (It's one special style, not different styles for different groups of tags.) So Q&A could make code-review stand out like that, along with any other future tags that should be treated spec... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278470 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Who should the moderators be? As we have set up communities here on the Codidact network we've been appointing temporary moderators. Usually some people stand out from the proposal process and early activity. Ultimately, of course, we want each community to choose its own moderators; we've been doing this as a stopgap, while co... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277410 |
@luap42 is this still and issue or did your other edit/diff changes fix this too? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278393 |
@Lundin the team monitors all the metas for bug reports, so it's fine to ask here. (When problems aren't clear or there could be workarounds, the wider audience of main Meta can help, but here the problem seems pretty clear.) (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278194 |
@Lundin that's a good point about self-answered Q&A modeling the Q&A we want. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278189 |
@meriton sorry, I probably should have used more qualifiers there. I've seen self-answered questions, both here and elsewhere, that got comments criticizing the question. When you already know the answer, it's easier to leave critical information out of the question. And I've seen complaints (main... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278189 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
Do we want a wiki (or similar) alongside Q&A? In addition to Q&A, Codidact supports another post type, article. Articles can be used for blog posts, wiki pages, and other resources. Articles, like questions, use tags, so searching for a tag would find them alongside questions. Articles, unlike questions, do not have answers, though they do ha... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277360 |
A package system for separation with intentional versioning seems like a sound approach to me. But I'm the OP and probably less equipped to evaluate than others here. I see that someone has downvoted this answer and would like to understand why, if possible. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277306 |
It looks like the dev team has done some repo cleanup since we first looked at this; their repo is now down to about 70GB, and doc's WIndows machines aren't loaded up with as much corporate bloatware as they used to be. So we could actually share now; thanks for pointing it out. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278067 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: How can I fill in tag information? I've just lowered the reputation requirement for both Edit and Edit Tag from 250 to 200. If folks here want it to be lower -- young communities have different needs, after all -- please make a meta post so people can vote. Thanks. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277551 |
Post edited: scrollbar, not linewrap |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #278051 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Answer | — |
A: Long code lines are not wrapped Code blocks that are wider than the column they're trying to fit in now get horizontal scrollbars. As noted in another answer, it's not safe to assume that line-wrapping won't change the correctness of code. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277984 |
Also, what counts as a long line for display purposes is affected by display size and zoom. Code that looks just fine on a full-size monitor might be sad on a phone. You can never format your code so that it'll never have problems, so regardless of what the poster does, the site might still need to... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277962 |
[TopAnswers](https://topanswers.xyz/) has sites for Web Client Dev and Web Server Dev; I don't know if this fits one of those but you could try dropping into their main chat (attached to their meta site) and see what they say. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277946 |
Post edited: looks like the terminating ``` needs to be on its own line? attempting to move text out of the code block... |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277141 |
Thanks @Wikis. It's great to have you here. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277906 |
Ok, I added that as a short description for now, while the community figures out what this tag should be. We can edit, rename, or remove later, as needed. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277891 |
A user created a tag containing a space, which broke things, and an admin changed it to have the hyphen. I don't think admins were weighing in on the merits of the tag, just trying to mitigate a bug. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277551 |
Or the code blocks with lines too long for the space should get scrollbars so they stay in bounds without anything getting truncated. I don't know what's better here, scrolling or auto-wrap, but either would be better than letting them get so wide that they don't fit and over/underlap other content.... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277885 |
Hello. Apparently we have a bug that affected the layout on this post (made things kind of unreadable). I'm trying to get that fixed, but in the meantime I made an edit that I *believe* is harmless but want to check. In the first code block, I moved each attribute to its own line instead of having... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277885 |
Post edited: Apparently wide code doesn't get a scrollbar right now and instead messes up the page formatting. I'm sorry; we'll get that fixed. Meanwhile trying this workaround so this page displays ok. |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277264 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277288 |
Post edited: |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277833 |
The title sounds like you want to disable a specific user, but the body sounds like you want to disable "everyone but me". Is the latter correct? (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277320 |
And document the choice in your coding conventions, for the sake of people who join your team later. (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Edit | Post #277288 | Initial revision | — | over 4 years ago |
| Question | — |
How should we share some content between two otherwise-independent git repositories? We have two teams, dev and doc, and I'd like them to have shared access (via git) to a common subset of content. Specifically, I would like the examples that are used in the doc and that are scriptable to be part of our regular (dev) tests, so we'll know if a code change has broken one of them. Rig... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277263 |
We don't need to emulate the structure on SE. We should do what makes sense to the community *here*. Think of categories as different *kinds* of content, not just different *subjects*. For example, contests or challenges aren't regular Q&A; it makes sense to separate those. But design is part of soft... (more) |
— | over 4 years ago |