Communities

Writing
Writing
Codidact Meta
Codidact Meta
The Great Outdoors
The Great Outdoors
Photography & Video
Photography & Video
Scientific Speculation
Scientific Speculation
Cooking
Cooking
Electrical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Judaism
Judaism
Languages & Linguistics
Languages & Linguistics
Software Development
Software Development
Mathematics
Mathematics
Christianity
Christianity
Code Golf
Code Golf
Music
Music
Physics
Physics
Linux Systems
Linux Systems
Power Users
Power Users
Tabletop RPGs
Tabletop RPGs
Community Proposals
Community Proposals
tag:snake search within a tag
answers:0 unanswered questions
user:xxxx search by author id
score:0.5 posts with 0.5+ score
"snake oil" exact phrase
votes:4 posts with 4+ votes
created:<1w created < 1 week ago
post_type:xxxx type of post
Search help
Notifications
Mark all as read See all your notifications »

Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!

Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.

Activity for Monica Cellio‭

Type On... Excerpt Status Date
Edit Post #278539 Initial revision about 4 years ago
Question How do I configure Jenkins to strip the leading “origin/” in git branch parameter?
I'm using Jenkins with a branch parameter to specify the branch to build from. Other stuff downstream needs the branch name to not have the leading "origin/" -- just "feature/blahblah" or "bugfix/12345" or similar. The advanced settings for the parameter let me specify a branch filter via regex, but ...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278472 Right now close reasons are per-community, not per-community-per-category. We could adopt a convention like "[CR] reason" and "[Q&A] reason" for the ones that are unique to a category, until category-specific reasons are possible.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278468 A category can define tags that get special styling, like bug/discussion/feature-request/support here on meta. (It's one special style, not different styles for different groups of tags.) So Q&A could make code-review stand out like that, along with any other future tags that should be treated spec...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Edit Post #278470 Initial revision about 4 years ago
Question Who should the moderators be?
As we have set up communities here on the Codidact network we've been appointing temporary moderators. Usually some people stand out from the proposal process and early activity. Ultimately, of course, we want each community to choose its own moderators; we've been doing this as a stopgap, while co...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #277410 @luap42 is this still and issue or did your other edit/diff changes fix this too?
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278393 @Lundin the team monitors all the metas for bug reports, so it's fine to ask here. (When problems aren't clear or there could be workarounds, the wider audience of main Meta can help, but here the problem seems pretty clear.)
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278194 @Lundin that's a good point about self-answered Q&A modeling the Q&A we want.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #278189 @meriton sorry, I probably should have used more qualifiers there. I've seen self-answered questions, both here and elsewhere, that got comments criticizing the question. When you already know the answer, it's easier to leave critical information out of the question. And I've seen complaints (main...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Edit Post #278189 Initial revision about 4 years ago
Question Do we want a wiki (or similar) alongside Q&A?
In addition to Q&A, Codidact supports another post type, article. Articles can be used for blog posts, wiki pages, and other resources. Articles, like questions, use tags, so searching for a tag would find them alongside questions. Articles, unlike questions, do not have answers, though they do ha...
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #277360 A package system for separation with intentional versioning seems like a sound approach to me. But I'm the OP and probably less equipped to evaluate than others here. I see that someone has downvoted this answer and would like to understand why, if possible.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Comment Post #277306 It looks like the dev team has done some repo cleanup since we first looked at this; their repo is now down to about 70GB, and doc's WIndows machines aren't loaded up with as much corporate bloatware as they used to be. So we could actually share now; thanks for pointing it out.
(more)
about 4 years ago
Edit Post #278067 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Answer A: How can I fill in tag information?
I've just lowered the reputation requirement for both Edit and Edit Tag from 250 to 200. If folks here want it to be lower -- young communities have different needs, after all -- please make a meta post so people can vote. Thanks.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277551 Post edited:
scrollbar, not linewrap
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #278051 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Answer A: Long code lines are not wrapped
Code blocks that are wider than the column they're trying to fit in now get horizontal scrollbars. As noted in another answer, it's not safe to assume that line-wrapping won't change the correctness of code.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277984 Also, what counts as a long line for display purposes is affected by display size and zoom. Code that looks just fine on a full-size monitor might be sad on a phone. You can never format your code so that it'll never have problems, so regardless of what the poster does, the site might still need to...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277962 [TopAnswers](https://topanswers.xyz/) has sites for Web Client Dev and Web Server Dev; I don't know if this fits one of those but you could try dropping into their main chat (attached to their meta site) and see what they say.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277946 Post edited:
looks like the terminating ``` needs to be on its own line? attempting to move text out of the code block...
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277141 Thanks @Wikis. It's great to have you here.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277906 Ok, I added that as a short description for now, while the community figures out what this tag should be. We can edit, rename, or remove later, as needed.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277891 A user created a tag containing a space, which broke things, and an admin changed it to have the hyphen. I don't think admins were weighing in on the merits of the tag, just trying to mitigate a bug.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277551 Or the code blocks with lines too long for the space should get scrollbars so they stay in bounds without anything getting truncated. I don't know what's better here, scrolling or auto-wrap, but either would be better than letting them get so wide that they don't fit and over/underlap other content....
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277885 Hello. Apparently we have a bug that affected the layout on this post (made things kind of unreadable). I'm trying to get that fixed, but in the meantime I made an edit that I *believe* is harmless but want to check. In the first code block, I moved each attribute to its own line instead of having...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277885 Post edited:
Apparently wide code doesn't get a scrollbar right now and instead messes up the page formatting. I'm sorry; we'll get that fixed. Meanwhile trying this workaround so this page displays ok.
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277264 Post edited:
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277288 Post edited:
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277833 The title sounds like you want to disable a specific user, but the body sounds like you want to disable "everyone but me". Is the latter correct?
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277320 And document the choice in your coding conventions, for the sake of people who join your team later.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277288 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Question How should we share some content between two otherwise-independent git repositories?
We have two teams, dev and doc, and I'd like them to have shared access (via git) to a common subset of content. Specifically, I would like the examples that are used in the doc and that are scriptable to be part of our regular (dev) tests, so we'll know if a code change has broken one of them. Rig...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277263 We don't need to emulate the structure on SE. We should do what makes sense to the community *here*. Think of categories as different *kinds* of content, not just different *subjects*. For example, contests or challenges aren't regular Q&A; it makes sense to separate those. But design is part of soft...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277235 I'd like to see testing here, too -- unit, regression, integration, etc, and frameworks for doing them.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277232 @hkotsubo I think there's an opportunity here for the software community to build an outstanding library of articles alongside Q&A. They'll be more visible than they would be as tag descriptions, and yes they could be linked from tag descriptions (or from answers, or from outside the network like wh...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277232 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Answer A: Can regular users add tag wikis? And what are the guidelines for creating them?
Editing tag descriptions is a privilege, currently based on reputation. (Changes to the privilege system are coming, but not yet.) The threshold is currently set at 250 rep. I recognize the bootstrapping problem of a new site, particularly one that doesn't have moderators yet. Please feel free to...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277184 To me all of that is programming, so thank you for pointing out that others might make distinctions we didn't intend.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277184 Post edited:
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277184 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Answer A: "Software Development" to the exclusion of other programming and scripting?
It's meant to include all programming and scripting. By calling it Software Development we wanted to convey that it's not just code but also those other things. I'll adjust the description of the Q&A category; if people can propose better descriptions there, and also for our description on the list...
(more)
over 4 years ago
Comment Post #277144 Something to keep in mind when tagging here: Codidact supports hierarchical tags, which is relevant for questions about specific versions of languages, libraries, etc. We can organize that better than with a flat tag list.
(more)
over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277131 Post edited over 4 years ago
Edit Post #277141 Initial revision over 4 years ago
Question Welcome to Software Development!
Welcome to the Codidact site for Software Development! We're glad you're here and we're excited to see what you will build. This community is starting "from scratch", without importing Q&A from other sites, so your community can set its own direction.[^1] Please ask questions about all aspects of ...
(more)
over 4 years ago