Welcome to Software Development on Codidact!
Will you help us build our independent community of developers helping developers? We're small and trying to grow. We welcome questions about all aspects of software development, from design to code to QA and more. Got questions? Got answers? Got code you'd like someone to review? Please join us.
Activity for Lundin
| Type | On... | Excerpt | Status | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comment | Post #282489 |
If there's enough interest I could write another of them self-answered Q&A about how to do OO in C. Private encapsulation, setter/getters, inheritance & polymorphism. There's plenty of examples at SO but I find them lacking. I think I've written a few there myself too but I can't find them. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282486 |
@#53922 Depends on the context. During declaration of the variable, you can write `Node* ptr`, `Node *ptr` or `Node * ptr`, it's a matter of style. (the former 2 styles are most common). When _de-referencing_ the pointer to get the items it points at, you always write `*ptr`. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282464 |
I wrote a Q&A FAQ about uninitialized pointers here: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37549594/crash-or-segmentation-fault-when-data-is-copied-scanned-read-to-an-uninitializ (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282206 |
It's kind of strange that tags have case in the first place. I wonder if they were made that way on purpose. If so, we'd need to come up with guidelines for when & how to use upper case. If not, it just seems like a source for sloppy-looking tags. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282129 |
I don't like Discord specifically simply for the reason that it's spyware. Scanning which programs you have installed on your computer and sending that information over the internet, for unclear and highly questionable purposes. It would good to have a chat room though. Is IRC still a thing? :) (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281810 |
@Estela I don't think we can use that as a distinction. HTML, SQL, batch script and so on is on-topic here. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #282044 |
Check if `root_element` is NULL or not, straight after calling `xmlDocGetRootElement`. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281859 |
Well I didn't even know there were tool tips before you posted this. Nor did I know SO had them on the voting buttons and I've been using that site for over 10 years... apparently my brain filters out such things as spam and doesn't register them. So changing/implementing them might not necessarily h... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281872 |
My only concern is that it will seem like the site is just about Office questions and nothing else, it will momentarily "drown out" all other content. But the migration is just a single event, so maybe it should be done sooner rather than later. (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281859 |
Not sure if I'm following, sorry. Are you proposing that we change the tool tips when we mouse-over the vote buttons? Or are you asking if we should implement a specific page for this community to replace the default https://software.codidact.com/help/voting? Or both? (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281872 |
Well at this point it doesn't look like my proposal for that category is getting any strong consensus, so it's unlikely to be created any time soon. "Software Category" would just be the general Q&A on Power Users. For now, that's the most suitable place to move all those questions. But it will creat... (more) |
— | almost 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281475 |
@Istiak No. I was just able to reproduce the bug on Firefox & Chrome both using my phone. Latest versions no extensions, no plug-ins. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281808 |
Kind of depends on how you define these terms. All of them go back to the earliest days of computing, in some form. Private encapsulation of autonomous "abstract data types" was around very early, long before "modern" OOP emerged in the 1980s somewhere. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281475 |
@Istiak The latest version, since it auto updates. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281784 |
@Monica Cellio No but they will be plenty and risk to drown out all the other content because of it. Just look at Power Users right now, someone dropped 10 or so questions about MS Word there. The same will happen when we migrate all office suite-related questions from here to there. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281784 |
Better wait until their scope has settled. If we are not launching an office suite community then it would make lots of sense for Power Users to create a category for it. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281640 |
This post regarding scope is still open for community suggestions [Community feedback: What type of questions can I ask here?](https://software.codidact.com/posts/278648) Or we could start new ones. I suppose it might be easier to overview (and archive) if we post one question per issue instead of th... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281640 |
Also, I still think the scope of this site is still too vague for anyone to moderate it. There's a lot of corner cases which the community has yet to come up with a consensus about: tool/software recommendations, asking "where to find documentation" questions, homework dump policy, "how is x designed... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281640 |
What about the discussion about the "curate" privilege from meta [here](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281579)? If it is something similar to "20k+" on SE rather than full moderator duties, then it might be easier to get volunteers. For example, I probably don't mind chewing through edit/close revie... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281655 |
Generally, we shouldn't use the worst cases of cursing such as the F word because those collide with the "be nice" [code of conduct](https://software.codidact.com/policy/code-of-conduct). But in some cases the name of programming languages _are_ curses such and then we need to be able to refer to the... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281606 |
You simply can't discuss proper program design in vague and abstract terms - that's nothing but a source of pointless & badly designed abstraction layers. _What_ is the data that's being passed around and _why_ does it need to be passed around? Does each node know the destination or is it the server ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281520 |
@dmckee Hmm yeah I just realized I'm not quite up to date with C++. I was thinking `auto_ptr` but forgot there's a better alternative nowadays. Anyway, plain old manual allocation would do the trick too. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281528 |
@luap42 Ok so I found one of the old posts I wrote at those forums. I've updated it a bit and posted a proposal on meta.codidact here: [Giving question feedback in private - a moderating system to reduce conflicts](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/281546) (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281539 |
"I can see that what needs to be said has been, and there's no need to join in" We could also move all feedback to a special tab which you only visit in case you are actually interested in helping the OP. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281539 |
There's yet another aspect to keeping comments in private. A whole lot of users _don't_ want to be moderators. They don't want to teach random people on the Internet how to spell, how communicate with other humans, how to use the site and so on. They just want the crappy post gone from "their" site. ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281539 |
"or being dog-piled privately by six" The way SO does it: get down votes, wait a few minutes, get the first public comment, wait a few minutes, more negative comments, wait a few minutes, close/down votes keep coming, wait a few minutes, lots of negative comments half of them repeating what's already... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281528 |
@luap42 There were many such discussions on the old forums, though I'm not sure if we came up with any consensus. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
I get it every single time I do an edit now. It seems to be getting worse. Can we just disable this whole crap until it gets fixed? This is going to scale incredibly poorly when the sites grow. Then you'll have hundred posts like this per day. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281528 |
Also related, what happened to the [Arbitration & Review Panel](https://meta.codidact.com/posts/277346)? I guess it is meant to handle more serious issues than deleted comments, but similarly to my idea above, criticism against moderator decisions needn't necessarily be posted on public meta. It cou... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281528 |
Related to this - in them early discussion stages of Codidact, I proposed that all feedback about bad questions should be given privately, rather than using the public comment field, since it is a well-known source of anger and drama. People are prone to respond bad to criticism in general, but espec... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281520 |
@dmckee Smart pointers aren't necessarily smart in a multi-threaded context though. Because that makes heap allocated objects behave as if they have local scope. Not what you want - suppose you create a thread from another thread, then the creator finishes and goes out of scope. The smart pointer wil... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
It's still there, more frequent than ever it seems. Just got it again after posting [this answer](https://software.codidact.com/posts/281518). Maybe it's related to formatting or how long you spend typing the answer? That one was very long, so I kept the browser upon for a wee while. By the way, may ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281511 |
What's the question? Is there a software development problem you are trying to solve? Are you designing a web browser? Are you reverse-engineering one? (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281484 |
I guess they mean that you didn't have to declare the type because you are handed a default size integer. This was at least the case of B, BCPL and very early pre-standard C. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281474 |
@qsmodo Indeed there are lots of applications where the primitive types are never used and it is common to ban their use in coding standards. Proper introduction courses will address stdint.h. Alternatively you could use the peculiar rules from _Modern C/Gustedt_, where the recommended types to use ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281255 |
Seems like it is more prone to happen when you edit your own answers. I just got it too while logged and have to do it twice as well. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281475 |
(Using Firefox). (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
Link to the post that prompted for Captcha before I could post the answer: https://software.codidact.com/posts/281464#answer-281474. This contained code, but C (with C code formatting tags), not PHP. I'm always logged in to Codidact. Using Firefox. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281305 |
This keeps happening, it is very annoying. I just got this after a post where I was writing an answer, then went to edit the question post using the same browser window. Since I didn't trust the site to save the draft I was writing, I made a copy/paste of it first. When I returned to the answer, the ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281464 |
Please note that there is no such thing as "implicit casting". There are implicit and explicit _conversions_. A cast is always an explicit conversion done by the programmer, by using the cast operator (). There is no casting present in your example. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281434 |
Your question is about gaming terminology, not software development. If I'm writing a microcontroller program for a dishwasher, then that doesn't mean that it's suddenly ok for me to start asking questions about dishwashers here. Such questions are about the functionality of the specific application ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281434 |
This has absolutely nothing to do with software development. Kindly stop asking blatantly off-topic questions. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281308 |
It would be fine to ask this on meta. But currently, "asking to explain what a certain code does, unless they are small and an attempt to understand them is also added" is listed as off-topic for this site. https://software.codidact.com/help/on-topic. The meta discussion thread can be found here: htt... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #279578 |
@Incnis Mrsi Well it depends on if the braces would surround both gotos or just one. It wouldn't have passed manual code review either. If they had any resemblance of a quality coding standards, then none of the code from that link would be allowed. Not just the brace issue, but goto itself, assignm... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #277488 |
@Incnis Mrsi It means either 2's complement, 1's complement or signed magnitude. C unfortunately allows all of these still. In practice, the vast majority of all real-world computers use 2's complement. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281020 |
@Estela There's a place for macros and even function-like macros, but not in this specific case. Avoid them when you can. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280999 |
So as I see it there are 3 options: 1) either we'd create a "Beginner" category and make it default. 2) Or we turn the current "Q&A" into the beginner-friendly one and create an "Advanced" category (the name and scope would have to be debated separately). 3) Or we outlaw beginner questions, in which ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #280999 |
We've discussed this to-and-fro since the early stages of Codidact, for example [here](https://forum.codidact.org/t/how-to-treat-debugging-and-easy-to-google-and-very-basic-questions/1122/3). A separate category was proposed then too. And as indicated in that discussion (by experience from SO), such ... (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #278896 |
@Ayxan Haqverdili I'll try to replace it with another, please try again now. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |
| Comment | Post #281020 |
@Ayxan Haqverdili If it is a subclass, then the original code would have handled it differently than `std::runtime_error` yeah? Or otherwise there's no need for a dedicated `catch` block. (more) |
— | about 3 years ago |